2006
DOI: 10.1038/sj.eye.6702243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

24-h IOP control with latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost in subjects with exfoliation syndrome and ocular hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In earlier clinical studies comparing latanoprost to travoprost, some investigators concluded that the effectiveness of both agents to lower the IOP was comparable [8,9,11,13], while others concluded that travoprost was more effective than latanoprost [4-6, 10, 12]. However, there [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In earlier clinical studies comparing latanoprost to travoprost, some investigators concluded that the effectiveness of both agents to lower the IOP was comparable [8,9,11,13], while others concluded that travoprost was more effective than latanoprost [4-6, 10, 12]. However, there [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, travoprost was originally developed with benzalkonium chloride (BAK) as a preservative; however, only 0.004% travoprost ophthalmic solution without BAK (Travatan Z, Alcon Laboratories Inc, Fort Worth, TX, USA) is now available in Japan. It has been reported that travoprost without BAK solution has a similar IOP-lowering effect and safety to that of travoprost with BAK [3], and its effectiveness is equal or greater than that of latanoprost [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Both drugs reduce the IOP by approximately 20 to 40% of the baseline IOP [4][5][6][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 1 presents details of the exclusion criteria at the various stages during the study selection process. Five trials had more than 2 intervention arms, 28 [28][29][30][31][32][39][40][41] We did not pool the data from one trial, reported as an abstract, as we were unable to determine the group sizes. 42 Table 1 and 2 report the study characteristics and quality (see Tables 1 and 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…68 Several meta-analyses [88][89][90][91] have directly compared the clinical efficacy of the three main PGAs, latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost. Two independent meta-analyses, one 88 of 8 63,64,68,78,[85][86][87]92 and the other 89 of 13 trials (including double-blind parallel 57,63,93 or cross-over studies 41,42 and single blind parallel 64,78,85,86,[94][95][96] or cross-over studies) 97 found bimatoprost was superior to latanoprost in lowering morning IOP at all time points, supported by a later posthoc meta-analysis of 2 independent trials with 6 months follow-up. Weighted mean difference (WMD) for %IOP reduction (%IOPR) was 2.59% (P = 0.004) at 1 month to 5.60% (P , 0.001) at 6 months for one meta-analysis 89 and weighted mean (WM) IOP change from baseline ranged from a minimum of 0.50 mmHg (P = 0.05) at 0800 hours to a maximum of 1.17 mmHg (P , 0.001) at 1200 hours in the other meta-analysis 88 favoring bimatoprost over latanoprost.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Bimatoprost was superior in IOP lowering to travoprost only during the daytime (0800 and 1200 hours time-points), but latanoprost and travoprost were comparable at all time points (P # 0.82). 88 An industry-sponsored meta-analysis 90 of travoprost vs latanoprost (15 trials, n = 1098), 57,68,85,93,95,96,[98][99][100] travoprost vs bimatoprost (8 trials, n = 714), 57,85,87,93,95,96,101,102 and latanoprost vs bimatoprost (8 trials, n = 943) 57,64,85,86,93,95,96,103 found similar efficacy among the three PGAs. Studies comparing the PGA to other non-PGA glaucoma treatments, nonrandomized, dose-finding or cross-over trials, and short-term evaluations (less than 3 months) were excluded, although a trial evaluating timolol plus travoprost versus timolol alone, 100 was included indicating that the PGA effect has the same relative effect as if it were compared with no treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%