2007 Guideline for the Management of Ureteral Calculi

Preminger, Glenn M.; Tiselius, H.-G.; Assimos, Dean G.; Alken, P.; Buck, ArthurH.; Gallucci, Michele; Knoll, Thomas; Lingeman, James E.; Nakada, Stephen Y.; Pearle, Margaret S.; Sarıca, Kemal; Türk, Christian; Wolf, J. Stuart

doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.039

Cited by 798 publications

(523 citation statements)

References 82 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

472

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Calcium channel blockers did not demonstrate a statistically significant improvement in stone passage whereas significantly more (29%; confidence interval [CI] 20%-37%) patients passed their stones with alpha-blocker therapy than did patients receiving a placebo. 4 A Cochrane collaboration meta-analysis demonstrated a higher stone-free rate (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.33-1.64), a shorter time to stone passage (2.91 days less), with a decreased number of pain episodes, analgesic requirements and hospitalizations for patients with ureteral stones less than 10 mm treated with alpha-receptor antagonists compared to placebo. 8 Conversely, a recent large randomized controlled trial failed to show any benefit from the use of tamsulosin or nifedipine to promote stone passage 9 .…”

Section: Medical Expulsive Therapymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 2007 the AUA and EAU joined forces to publish the 2007 Guideline for the Management of Ureteral Calculi, 4 which represented a synthesis of the best available evidence at the time comparing outcomes for SWL to URS. This joint EAU/AUA Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel performed a systematic review of the English language literature published since 1997 and comprehensively analyzed outcomes data from the identified studies.…”

Section: Comparative Outcomes Of Swl Vs Ursmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi

Ordon

Andonian²,

Blew³

et al. 2015

CUAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The focus of this guideline is the management of ureteral stones. Specifically, the topics covered include: conservative management, medical expulsive therapy, active intervention with either shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) or ureteroscopy (URS), factors affecting SWL treatment success, optimizing success, and special considerations (e.g., pregnancy, urinary diversion). By performing extensive literature reviews for each topic evaluated, we have generated an evidence-based consensus on the management of ureteral stones. The objective of this guideline is to help standardize the treatment of ureteral stones to optimize treatment outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Medical Expulsive Therapymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Comparative Outcomes Of Swl Vs Ursmentioning

confidence: 99%

CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi

Ordon

Andonian²,

Blew³

et al. 2015

CUAJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several studies have demonstrated stone-free rates as follows: renal pelvis 76%, upper calyx 69%, middle calyx 68%, and lower calyx 59%. Stone free rates were dependent on stone burden, with stones < 10 mm allowing excellent stone-free rates [2,22] . SWL success depends on many determinants, such as stone burden, position, composition of the stones, habitus of patient, and the efficacy of the lithotripter.…”

Section: Extracorporeal Swlmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of urinary stone disease and its treatment on renal function

Mercimek

Özden

2015

WJN

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Urolithiasis is a common disease that affects urinary tract in all age groups. Both in adults and in children, stone size, location, renal anatomy, and other factors, can influence the success of treatment modalities. Recently, there has been a great advancement in technology for minimally invasive management of urinary stones.The epoch of open treatment modalities has passed and currently there are much less invasive treatment approaches, such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy, ureteroscopy, shockwave lithotripsy, and retrograde internal Surgery. Furthermore, advancement in imaging technics ensures substantial knowledge that permit physician to decide the most convenient treatment method for the patient. Thus, effective and rapid treatment of urinary tract stones is substantial for the preservation of the renal function. In this review, the effects of the treatment options for urinary stones on renal function have been reviewed. Core tip: In this article, urinary stone disease, treatment options and its effects on renal function are examined. Moreover, in the light of recent publications, effect of treatment options on functional state of the kidney in patients with renal impairment is investigated.Mehmet NM, Ender O. Effect of urinary stone disease and its treatment on renal function. World

show abstract

“…O manejo de pacientes com cálculos ureterais sintomáticos possui algoritmo validado [29] . No que tange ao tratamento de cálculos assintomáticos, apenas a litíase renal tem protocolos bem estabelecidos [30] .…”

Section: Cálculo Ureteral Silenciosounclassified

“…Idealmente, o USG deve ser associado à radiografia simples de abdome em casos de cálculos radiopacos [29,38] . Já para pacientes que desenvolvem sintomas no pós-operatório, a TC com contraste é recomendada desde que não existam contraindicações.…”

Section: Cálculo Ureteral Silenciosounclassified

Influência do cálculo ureteral silencioso sobre a função renal antes e após o tratamento

Marchini¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

2007 Guideline for the Management of Ureteral Calculi

Cited by 798 publications

References 82 publications

CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi

CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi

Effect of urinary stone disease and its treatment on renal function

Influência do cálculo ureteral silencioso sobre a função renal antes e após o tratamento

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About