1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.0676h.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2-Aminobenzoyl-CoA Monooxygenase/Reductase. Evidence for Two Distinct Loci Catalyzing Substrate Monooxygenation and Hydrogenation

Abstract: 2-Aminobenzoyl-CoA monooxygenaselreductase catalyzes both monooxygenation and hydrogenation of anthraniloyl-CoA. Its reactivity with 11 substrate analogs has been investigated. Only 2-aminobenzoylCoA (anthraniloyl-CoA) in its normal and deuterated (5-'H) form is a full substrate, and only traces of 2-hydroxybenzoyl-CoA (salicyloyl-CoA) are probably monooxygenated but not hydrogenated. The purified enzyme is a homodimer and has been resolved preparatively into three major species by anion-exchange chromatograph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the preceding paper [in this journal (Langkau et al, 1995)], a kinetic scheme was elaborated for enzyme turnover which is consistent with the low NADH oxidase activity of ABzCoA-M/R as compared to the high turnover with NADH and the artificial electron acceptor N-ethylmaleimide (MalNEt).…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the preceding paper [in this journal (Langkau et al, 1995)], a kinetic scheme was elaborated for enzyme turnover which is consistent with the low NADH oxidase activity of ABzCoA-M/R as compared to the high turnover with NADH and the artificial electron acceptor N-ethylmaleimide (MalNEt).…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The enzyme was purified according to . Activity of ABzCoA-M/R was assayed by following the disappearance of NADH at 340 nm using either ABzCoA or MalNEt (Langkau et al, 1995) as substrates. H,O, was determined enzymically according to Lockridge et al (1972).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations