2016
DOI: 10.1155/2016/1468514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

2.5D Inversion Algorithm of Frequency-Domain Airborne Electromagnetics with Topography

Abstract: We presented a 2.5D inversion algorithm with topography for frequency-domain airborne electromagnetic data. The forward modeling is based on edge finite element method and uses the irregular hexahedron to adapt the topography. The electric and magnetic fields are split into primary (background) and secondary (scattered) field to eliminate the source singularity. For the multisources of frequency-domain airborne electromagnetic method, we use the large-scale sparse matrix parallel shared memory direct solver PA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2D or 3D geological complexity exists (e.g., see Cox et al, 2010;Ellis, 1998;Raiche et al, 2001;Wilson et al, 2006). Several 2D and 3D modeling and inversion analyses have also been developed (e.g., by Cox et al, 2010;Heagy et al, 2017;Noh et al, 2018;Sasaki, 2001;Xi and Li, 2016;Yang et al, 2014); however, their acceptance has been limited because the number of observations used in the inversion was restricted due to computational constraints, or because the inversion codes were not publicly available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2D or 3D geological complexity exists (e.g., see Cox et al, 2010;Ellis, 1998;Raiche et al, 2001;Wilson et al, 2006). Several 2D and 3D modeling and inversion analyses have also been developed (e.g., by Cox et al, 2010;Heagy et al, 2017;Noh et al, 2018;Sasaki, 2001;Xi and Li, 2016;Yang et al, 2014); however, their acceptance has been limited because the number of observations used in the inversion was restricted due to computational constraints, or because the inversion codes were not publicly available.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%