Visual Communication 2014
DOI: 10.1515/9783110255492.445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

19. Visual Communication in the Theatre

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The calculated gaps in the former are larger than those in the latter, by about 4 MeV at the maximum, for example. This difference is brought about by that in the coupling constants rather than the Fock effect itself [38]. Actually we confirmed that a Hartree calculation with the coupling constants of the Hartree-Fock gave almost the same gaps as those given by the Hartree-Fock calculation although such a calculation destroys the saturation completely.…”
Section: Relativistic Hartree-fock-bogoliubov Calculation With a Cutoffsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The calculated gaps in the former are larger than those in the latter, by about 4 MeV at the maximum, for example. This difference is brought about by that in the coupling constants rather than the Fock effect itself [38]. Actually we confirmed that a Hartree calculation with the coupling constants of the Hartree-Fock gave almost the same gaps as those given by the Hartree-Fock calculation although such a calculation destroys the saturation completely.…”
Section: Relativistic Hartree-fock-bogoliubov Calculation With a Cutoffsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The best value to use might be option e for the reasons discussed above. This choice is also recommended by Carlson [82]. Note, that in The experimental fitting results agree with the Gaussian shape, and significantly diverge from the dipole parameterization at momentum transfers ≥ 0.2 GeV.…”
Section: Two-photon Exchangementioning
confidence: 85%
“…= 6.695 ± 0.040 meV (15). However, expressing the elastic part of the TPE using only the Friar moment does not account for relativistic recoil corrections[82] (see option d).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One reason is that they adopted coupling constants which reproduced the saturation in the Hartree-Fock approximation, not the Hartree (so-called MFT) approximation. This leads to larger pairing gaps [31]. The other reason is the difference in the evaluation of the Dirac sea effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%