“…Yet, there is little knowledge on how the institutional settings of international partnerships with conflict-affected states influence behavioural choices of households, firms, the international community, conflicting parties and elites; and how these affect broad development goals. Particularly in the context of fragility and conflicts, policy objectives need to reflect the special socio-economic, cultural and political context, and respond to human security threats without compromising goals for sustainable development and wellbeing in the long-term (Brück, 2001; Gervais, 2004). Integrating those behavioural aspects into a framework based on a systematic PCSD perspective on human security could contribute to greater effectiveness, in particular in the context of fragmented and complex societal settings of fragile and conflict-affected regions (Figure 1, Behavioural Responses).…”