“…Several comments can be made to the assumptions from the Basler model: 1) The curvature 1/ is based on the strain in the flange and the neutral axis placed at middle height of a symmetric girder; steel plate girders can be symmetrical, but steel-concrete composite plate sections are unlikely to be; still, for a simply supported girder with a class 4 symmetric cross-section, the effective cross-section is asymmetric, and so the position of the neutral axis shifts downwards to the bottom tension flange; the curvature based on the compressive flange and the ensuing web compressive stress σz will therefore decrease, and the web slenderness limit may slightly increase; 2) When using HSS, the stability and fatigue issues often govern the design [2]; in such case ULS combinations create stresses lower than the high steel strength; So, the compressive deviation force applied to the web can be reduced from the maximum assumed value | 162 f = f yf , and the slender limit imposed by flange-induced buckling on the web will therefore be increased; 3) Basler model assumed that the web is simply supported by the flanges and so the column buckling length of the web is equal to the web depth ℎw; however, the web edges are welded to the flanges, and a top slab may exist, and so some rotational stiffness caused by the flanges may exist. In that case, the buckling length is smaller than the web depth, increasing the web slenderness limit; 4) Basler model neglects the longitudinal web stresses x due to bending, much higher than the vertical stresses z .…”