12th Biannual conference of the German cognitive science society (Gesellschaft für Kognitionswissenschaft)

Butz, Martin V.

doi:10.1007/s10339-014-0632-2

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 249 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Incorporated are studies that use the following temporal cues as stimulus, prime, or response, presented either visually or auditorily: 1. Past-or future-related words or phrases (Aguirre & Santiago, 2017;Bottini, Crepaldi, Casasanto, Crollen, & Collignon, 2015;Casasanto & Bottini, 2014;De la Vega, Eikmeier, Ulrich, & Kaup, 2016;Ding, Feng, Cheng, Liu, & Fan, 2015;Eikmeier, Alex-Ruf, Maienborn, & Ulrich, 2015, experiment 2;Eikmeier, Hoppe, & Ulrich, 2015;Eikmeier, Schr€ oter, Maienborn, Alex-Ruf, & Ulrich, 2013, experiment 2;Hartmann & Mast, 2012;Kong & You, 2012;Ouellet, Rom an, & Santiago, 2012;Ouellet, Santiago, Funes, & Lupi añez, 2010;Ouellet, Santiago, Israeli, et al, 2010;Rolke et al, 2013;Rolke, Ruiz Fern andez, Seibold, & Rahona, 2014;Santiago, Lupi añez, P erez, & Funes, 2007;Torralbo et al, 2006;Weger & Pratt, 2008, experiment 2);…”

Section: Temporal Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Space–Time Congruency Effect: A Meta‐Analysis

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Several reaction time (RT) studies report faster responses when responses to temporal information are arranged in a spatially congruent manner than when this arrangement is incongruent. The resulting space–time congruency effect is commonly attributed to a culturally salient localization of temporal information along a mental timeline (e.g., a mental timeline that runs from left to right). The present study aims to provide a compilation of the published RT studies on this time–space association in order to estimate the size of its effect and the extent of potential publication bias in this field of research. In this meta‐analysis, three types of task are distinguished due to hitherto existing empirical findings. These findings suggest that the extent to which time is made relevant to the experimental task has a systematic impact on whether or not the mental timeline is activated. The results of this meta‐analysis corroborate these considerations: First, experiments that make time a task‐relevant dimension have a mean effect size of d = 0.46. Second, in experiments in which time is task irrelevant, the effect size does not significantly deviate from zero. Third, temporal priming studies have a surprisingly high mean effect size of d = 0.47, which, however, should be adjusted to d = 0.36 due to publication bias.

show abstract

Section: Temporal Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Space–Time Congruency Effect: A Meta‐Analysis

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is related to findings from visual perception and attention research showing that objects that stand out from their surroundings quickly reach the focus of attention (e.g., Treisman and Gelade, 1980;Wang and Theeuwes, 2020). Researchers have extensively investigated how these factors affect landmark selection (e.g., Appleyard, 1969;Itti and Koch, 2001;Jin et al, 2004;Röser et al, 2013;Butz, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Landmark selection for route instructions: At which corner of an intersection is the preferred landmark located?

Hamburger¹,

Röser²,

Knauff³

2022

Front. Comput. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Cognitive studies showed that good landmarks–salient objects in the environment–make it easier for recipients of route instructions to find their way to the destination. Adding landmarks to route instructions also improves mobile navigation systems for pedestrians. But, which landmarks do people consider most helpful when giving route instructions? Four experiments explored this question. In the first experiment, the environment, including the route and landmarks, was presented on a map. The landmarks were located at the four corners of a right-angled intersection. Participants had to select those landmark-based route instructions they considered most helpful. In all other experiments, the environment was presented from an egocentric perspective, either in a video or as a sequence of pictures of intersections. Participants had to select those landmarks they would use in a route instruction. All landmarks had the same visual and semantic salience. The positions of the participants at the intersection were varied. Results show that participants consistently selected landmarks at the side of the road into which they had to turn. Moreover, the participants' position at the intersection affected whether they selected landmarks before or behind the decision point. These results have consequences for human spatial cognition research and for the automatic selection of landmarks in mobile pedestrian navigation systems.

show abstract

Translation of Cognitive Models from ACT-R to Constraint Handling Rules

Gall¹,

Frühwirth²

2016

Rule Technologies. Research, Tools, and Applications

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

12th Biannual conference of the German cognitive science society (Gesellschaft für Kognitionswissenschaft)

Cited by 6 publications

References 249 publications

The Space–Time Congruency Effect: A Meta‐Analysis

The Space–Time Congruency Effect: A Meta‐Analysis

Landmark selection for route instructions: At which corner of an intersection is the preferred landmark located?

Translation of Cognitive Models from ACT-R to Constraint Handling Rules

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About