2019
DOI: 10.9788/tp2019.2-10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ReligiositySpirituality (RS) in the Clinical Context: Professional Experiences of Psychotherapists

Abstract: Although the scientifi c production on religiosity/spirituality (R/S) is increasing, notably from their connection with the health dimension, this theme is practically absent in Psychology training. The objective of this study was to learn the professional reality of psychotherapists regarding their clinical experiences and the R/S dimension. Twenty-four professionals from two cities in the states of São Paulo and Minas Gerais, Brazil, with an average psychotherapy experience of 10.54 years, were interviewed i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(47 reference statements)
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The strongest preference of the three categories was for R/S integration, suggesting that clients, as a group, prefer some level of integration to occur, but they do not desire a lot of time to be spent on R/S issues and an R/S match with a psychotherapist is not deemed necessary to facilitate the integration. This finding matches previous research indicating that clients do prefer R/S integration in psychotherapy (Cunha & Comin, 2019; Dimmick et al, 2021; Martinez et al, 2007; Post & Wade, 2009; Rose et al, 2001; Rosmarin et al, 2015); however, given that our preference questions also assessed preference strength, our findings add to the literature suggesting that the R/S preferences may not be as strong as previously thought.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The strongest preference of the three categories was for R/S integration, suggesting that clients, as a group, prefer some level of integration to occur, but they do not desire a lot of time to be spent on R/S issues and an R/S match with a psychotherapist is not deemed necessary to facilitate the integration. This finding matches previous research indicating that clients do prefer R/S integration in psychotherapy (Cunha & Comin, 2019; Dimmick et al, 2021; Martinez et al, 2007; Post & Wade, 2009; Rose et al, 2001; Rosmarin et al, 2015); however, given that our preference questions also assessed preference strength, our findings add to the literature suggesting that the R/S preferences may not be as strong as previously thought.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The first aim was to identify the magnitude of client preferences for R/S integration overall, the amount of time desired to be spent on R/S topics, and the importance of a R/S match with a psychotherapist, and test whether these preferences differed depending on whether the client identified as religious. Based on the existing research (Cunha & Comin, 2019; Dimmick et al, 2021; Martinez et al, 2007; Post & Wade, 2009; Rose et al, 2001; Rosmarin et al, 2015), we hypothesized that preferences for R/S integration would exist and that religious clients, compared with nonreligious clients, would hold stronger preferences in each of the three areas. Within this aim, we also desired to understand whether client preferences in these three areas were related to expectations that R/S integration would lead to improved outcomes.…”
Section: Aims Of the Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(b) The lack of S&H training for students and health professionals (Cavalheiro and Falcke 2014;Costa et al 2019;Lucchetti and Granero 2010;Aguiar et al 2017). (c) Integration of spirituality into healthcare (Esperandio 2014;Moreira-Almeida et al 2006;Sens et al 2019;Cunha and Comin 2019;Oliveira et al 2018). (d) Relationship between spirituality/religiosity and health in the general population (Lucchetti et al 2013;Cavalcanti et al 2012;Moreira-Almeida et al 2010).…”
Section: Main Topics Investigated In the Groups And Lines Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%