2015
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2015(09)04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Differences between the real and the desired worlds in the results of clinical trials

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:We refer to the effectiveness (known as pragmatic or real world) and efficacy (known as explanatory or desired or ideal world) of interventions. However, these terms seem to be randomly chosen by investigators who design clinical trials and do not always reflect the true purpose of the study. A pragmatic-explanatory continuum indicator summary tool was thus developed with the aim of identifying the characteristics of clinical trials that distinguish between effectiveness and efficacy issues. We verif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in the design (explanatory vs pragmatic), end points, and adjudication process may account for the differing results. All bAVM patients must participate in research to better understand the natural history of the disease and the proposed therapies, such as EVT, in order to resolve these discrepancies (93) (94).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences in the design (explanatory vs pragmatic), end points, and adjudication process may account for the differing results. All bAVM patients must participate in research to better understand the natural history of the disease and the proposed therapies, such as EVT, in order to resolve these discrepancies (93) (94).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All bAVM patients must participate in research to better understand the natural history of the disease and the proposed therapies, such as EVT, to resolve these discrepancies. 92,93 Innovation in bAVM EVT may take on a variety of forms, such as the approach, the type of LEA, and adjuvant in situ or systemic treatment. If successful, the venous approach's democratization and advancement could change the paradigm of care in view of a potential sharp rise in cure rates that exceed 90%.…”
Section: The Futurementioning
confidence: 99%