2015
DOI: 10.6061/clinics/2015(07)06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Artificial disc and vertebra system: a novel motion preservation device for cervical spinal disease after vertebral corpectomy

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To determine the range of motion and stability of the human cadaveric cervical spine after the implantation of a novel artificial disc and vertebra system by comparing an intact group and a fusion group.METHODS:Biomechanical tests were conducted on 18 human cadaveric cervical specimens. The range of motion and the stability index range of motion were measured to study the function and stability of the artificial disc and vertebra system of the intact group compared with the fusion group.RESULTS:In al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spinal non-fusion surgery aims to preserve and restore the motor function of the spine, which is a beneficial supplement to fusion surgery. For example, a significant amount of research has been conducted on artificial intervertebral discs, spinous process dynamic fixation devices, moveable vertebral bodies, and so on 14–17 . Due to the complex anatomy and movement of the atlantoaxial joint, research for an acceptable upper cervical non-fusion device, which at best can be as effective as an artificial knee or hip joint, still remains in an exploratory stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spinal non-fusion surgery aims to preserve and restore the motor function of the spine, which is a beneficial supplement to fusion surgery. For example, a significant amount of research has been conducted on artificial intervertebral discs, spinous process dynamic fixation devices, moveable vertebral bodies, and so on 14–17 . Due to the complex anatomy and movement of the atlantoaxial joint, research for an acceptable upper cervical non-fusion device, which at best can be as effective as an artificial knee or hip joint, still remains in an exploratory stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the traditional motion-preserving spinal prostheses have certain shortcomings in their design. The contact surface of these devices with the vertebral endplate is too flat, which induces a mismatch between the prosthesis and the endplate [ 11 ]. Moreover, such devices do not provide a sufficient bone grafting space, which may prolong the process of fusion between the prosthesis and the surrounding bone [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%