BOLD MRI at 1.5 Tesla in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: preliminary experience

Doria, A.; Crawley, Adrian; Babyn, Paul; Rayner, Tammy; McLimont, Marjorie; Moineddin, Rahim; Laxer, Ronald M.; Feldman, Brian M.

doi:10.6061/clinics/2013(05)22

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Novel imaging techniques, such as blood oxygen leveldependent (BOLD) MRI, 52 ultra-small super-paramagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) contrast-enhanced MRI, 53 diffusion tensor imaging, 54 delayed Gd(DTPA) T2 mapping, 55 T2 mapping, 56,57 sodium 58 and quantitative cartilage 59 MRI, 3D ultrasound, 60 microbubble contrast-enhanced US, 61 and positron emission tomography, 62 require further investigation, to determine what role they may play in the early assessment of hemophilic arthropathy in the future 63 (►Table 1).…”

Section: Imaging Of Hemophilic Arthropathy: What Needs To Be Done In mentioning

confidence: 99%

Imaging Evaluation of Hemophilia: Musculoskeletal Approach

Keshava

Gibikote

Doria

2015

Semin Thromb Hemost

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Imaging assessment is an important tool to evaluate clinical joint outcomes of hemophilia. Arthropathic changes have traditionally been evaluated by plain radiography and more recently by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Early arthropathic changes can be identified by modern imaging techniques such as T2 mapping MRI of cartilage even before clinical symptoms become apparent. Cross-sectional imaging modalities such as CT, ultrasonography, and MRI are useful in assessing bleeding-related musculoskeletal complications such as pseudotumors that still exist in some parts of the world. This article provides an overview of imaging of hemophilic arthropathy, and discusses the role and scope of individual imaging modalities currently in use in clinical practice, as well as of promising techniques that require further investigation in the immediate future.

show abstract