2018
DOI: 10.5935/medicalexpress.2018.mo.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Verify the influence of different exercise orders on the performance of the number of maximal repetitions in older women. METHODS: Twelve older women (65.7 ± 5.6 years, 66.9 ± 9.5 kg, 1.56 ± 0.67 m, 27.4 ± 3.6 kg/m 2 ) underwent four nonconsecutive visits and two different orders of Resistance Training. At the first visit, the volunteers were submitted to anamnesis, anthropometric evaluation and a 10RM test. On the second visit, a re-test of 10RM was performed. On the third and fourth visits, the vo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At weeks 19-30 (phase 1), participants were randomly assigned to four groups to perform a 12-wk RT program according to the respective exercise order (MJ-SJ-U, SJ-MJ-U, MJ-SJ-L, and SJ-MJ-L). In the following, participants underwent 12 wk of detraining (weeks [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45], in which they were asked not to engage in any physical exercise program during this period. Finally, in weeks 49-60 (phase 2), a crossover between the MJ-SJ and SJ-MJ conditions was carried out as follows: participants who had performed MJ-SJ-U in phase 1 then performed SJ-MJ-U; those who had performed SJ-MJ-U then performed MJ-SJ-U; those who had performed MJ-SJ-L then performed SJ-MJ-L, and those who had performed SJ-MJ-L then performed MJ-SJ-L.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At weeks 19-30 (phase 1), participants were randomly assigned to four groups to perform a 12-wk RT program according to the respective exercise order (MJ-SJ-U, SJ-MJ-U, MJ-SJ-L, and SJ-MJ-L). In the following, participants underwent 12 wk of detraining (weeks [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45], in which they were asked not to engage in any physical exercise program during this period. Finally, in weeks 49-60 (phase 2), a crossover between the MJ-SJ and SJ-MJ conditions was carried out as follows: participants who had performed MJ-SJ-U in phase 1 then performed SJ-MJ-U; those who had performed SJ-MJ-U then performed MJ-SJ-U; those who had performed MJ-SJ-L then performed SJ-MJ-L, and those who had performed SJ-MJ-L then performed MJ-SJ-L.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of exercise order effect in women (16)(17)(18)35), unlike in men (10), suggests a sex-dependent effect. Given that women are more fatigue tolerant than men (37) and that the exercise order effect seems to be dependent on the role of fatigue throughout the exercises, women seem to not have major fatigue during training sessions to the point of causing a reduction in performance in the last exercises (21,38,39). If some degree of fatigue occurs, this does not seem to largely affect chronic responses after traditional RT in this population (15,17,18,21).…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although it seems practical to prescribe a specific number of repetitions per set for all subjects, the maximal number of repetitions completed against a relative load (% 1RM or 3RM) presents high interindividual variability in young (12,37) and older adults (7,8,15). For example, when older women were instructed to perform 3 sets of 10RM, it was found that the maximal number of repetitions completed, in addition to having decreased throughout the sets, also varied among subjects (7,8,15). Thus, considering that the same stimulus will elicit different responses in older adults (1), alternative approaches are necessary to prescribe the volume and overcome the repetitionbased method's limitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%