Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the moisture content of litter was significantly decreased by the FMWLMLP or FMWLMLB diets compared to the control diet when stocking density was 18 broiler/ m 2 (P<0.0001). Our research result is not agreement with the findings of Lima et al (2018) who reported that stocking density in broiler did not influence the moisture of litter. Mahardhika et al (2019) pointed out that supplementation of probiotics to drinking water did not affect the moisture content of litter.…”
Section: Litter Moisturecontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the moisture content of litter was significantly decreased by the FMWLMLP or FMWLMLB diets compared to the control diet when stocking density was 18 broiler/ m 2 (P<0.0001). Our research result is not agreement with the findings of Lima et al (2018) who reported that stocking density in broiler did not influence the moisture of litter. Mahardhika et al (2019) pointed out that supplementation of probiotics to drinking water did not affect the moisture content of litter.…”
Section: Litter Moisturecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…High stocking density (18 broiler/m 2 ) significantly increased as compared to the normal stocking density (12 broiler/m 2 ) (P<0.0001). Our research result is not agreement with the findings of Lima et al (2018) who reported that stocking density in broiler did not significantly influence the litter pH. However, the effects of diets and stocking density x diet interaction on litter pH were not found to be significant.…”
Section: Litter Phcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to what was observed in the present study, Lima et al. (2018) reported a reduction in broiler weight gain as D increased, emphasizing that, despite a significant reduction in weight gain and feed intake, there was still a significant reduction in food conversion; that is, the birds were more efficient in converting metabolic energy from feed into live weight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The reduction in water and feed intake caused by increasing D may be linked to a lower availability of physical space, thus restricting the birds' mobility and making access to drinking fountains and feeders more difficult ( Lima et al., 2018 ). As a result, the birds' weight gain was also negatively affected by the increase in D, and since the weight gain of chickens under normal density conditions is directly proportional to food intake, it can be inferred that the reduction in weight gain observed in birds evaluated at higher densities is directly related to their lower feed intake.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no significant differences between experimental groups in terms of live weight, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio and mortality. It is interesting that some researchers also found no significant differences between the treatment groups (Aktan and Sagdic, 2004;El-Wahab et al, 2013;Bintas et al, 2014;Sharma et al, 2015;Yamak et al, 2016;Lima et al, 2018). However other researchers found significant differences between the treatment groups (Atencio et al, 2010;El-Deek et al, 2011;Chakma et al, 2012;Ritz et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%