2018
DOI: 10.5935/1806-6690.20180020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Visual assessment of pasture degradation: validation by ground cover and seasonal variation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The high number of classes of degradation complicates the separation of neighboring classes in the field (Monteiro et al, 2018). The values obtained for weighted kappa show that, after the effect of these confusions is revealed, the method of digital classification and mapping generates thematic maps with good accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high number of classes of degradation complicates the separation of neighboring classes in the field (Monteiro et al, 2018). The values obtained for weighted kappa show that, after the effect of these confusions is revealed, the method of digital classification and mapping generates thematic maps with good accuracy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology was developed considering eight classes of use intensity exerted by pastures, but it can be used if a lower number of classes is satisfactory and, according to the considerations of Monteiro et al (2018), its accuracy may be increased.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In pasture pig operations, an appropriate grazing management is necessary to prevent damage to the pasture and, consequently, soil degradation. The amount of ground cover in a certain pasture will be dependent on a variety of factors including the pasture species, climate, soil, pasture management [13] and seasonal variability [14]. The establishment of an adequate stocking rate is a key management component to assure the preservation of ground cover levels required to avoid negative environmental consequences.…”
Section: Ground Covermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dung, footprint, and forage activity reflected the relative use and or access of the encroachment category by herbivores (Pfeffer, 2016). Within each plot, tree species were identified and their structure (canopy diameter, stem diameter at 1m height, seedling occurrence, height) recorded and bare ground cover was visually estimated (Monteiro, Burak, Cunha, & Passos, 2018). Multi-stemmed woody plants were considered as separate individuals if they were >40 cm apart (Tefera, Dlamini, & Dlamini, 2008).…”
Section: Sampling Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%