2016
DOI: 10.5935/1678-9741.20160074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Should a Cardiac Surgeon Blame Himself for Replacing a Mitral Valve?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Percutaneous mitral repair may be an option for these patients. On the other hand, in patients with an acceptable risk profile, mitral repair is performed in IMR in the majority of patients [ 21 , 22 ] . We have performed isolated CABG in patients with high surgical risk and poor perioperative state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Percutaneous mitral repair may be an option for these patients. On the other hand, in patients with an acceptable risk profile, mitral repair is performed in IMR in the majority of patients [ 21 , 22 ] . We have performed isolated CABG in patients with high surgical risk and poor perioperative state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet despite all these developments, rates of valve repair surgery in the developing world is still below par. In Latin America, it is 30% in Colombia, 32% in Chile, 39% in Mexico, and 42% in Brazil during 2013 [1]. We do not have an authentic database in India but according to the industry sources, roughly 9.2% of valves are being repaired, most of which are tricuspid valve repairs (59%) followed by mitral valve (40%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%