2019
DOI: 10.5935/0103-507x.20190052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acute effects of ventilator hyperinflation with increased inspiratory time on respiratory mechanics: randomized crossover clinical trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements were considered acceptable if we detected no deflections in the flow or pressure curves and no plateau during the inspiratory pause, because such changes would suggest patient interference and the presence of leaks, respectively. 9 - 12 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements were considered acceptable if we detected no deflections in the flow or pressure curves and no plateau during the inspiratory pause, because such changes would suggest patient interference and the presence of leaks, respectively. 9 - 12 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included nine studies that compared manual hyperinflation with usual care, two randomized crossover trial (Choi & Jones, 2005; Hodgson et al., 2000) and seven randomized controlled trial (Barker & Adams, 2002; Blattner et al., 2008; Maa et al., 2005; Malekzadeh et al., 2016; Patman et al., 2000, 2009; Paulus et al., 2011; Table 1). There were four studies comparing hyperinflation performed using the mechanical ventilator with usual care, three randomized crossover trial (Assmann et al., 2016; Chicayban, 2019; Lemes et al., 2009) and one randomized controlled trial (Naue et al., 2019; Table 2). Four more studies that compared that compared manual hyperinflation with that performed using the mechanical ventilator, with three randomized crossover trials (Berney & Denehy, 2002; Dennis et al., 2012; Savian et al., 2006) and one randomized controlled trial (Ahmed et al., 2010; Table 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the PEDro scale, 10 studies were classified as of high methodological quality (Assmann et al., 2016; Blattner et al., 2008; Chicayban, 2019; Choi & Jones, 2005; Hodgson et al., 2000; Lemes et al., 2009; Naue et al., 2019; Patman et al., 2000, 2009; Paulus et al., 2011) and seven of moderate quality (Ahmed et al., 2010; Barker & Adams, 2002; Berney & Denehy, 2002; Dennis et al., 2012; Maa et al., 2005; Malekzadeh et al., 2016; Savian et al., 2006). As noted, most of the selected studies were classified as of high methodological quality (PEDro scale > 5 points).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations