2013
DOI: 10.5935/0103-5053.20130199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Comparison of Amperometric and Spectrophotometric Methods for the Iodide Concentration Measurement: a Tracer in Produced Water from Offshore Oil Reservoirs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…O limite de detecção é alto (ppm), o que inviabiliza o seu uso em aplicações de campo por questões econômicas (MELO et al, 2001, SOUZA et al, 2013 …”
Section: Estado Da Técnicaunclassified
“…O limite de detecção é alto (ppm), o que inviabiliza o seu uso em aplicações de campo por questões econômicas (MELO et al, 2001, SOUZA et al, 2013 …”
Section: Estado Da Técnicaunclassified
“…Currently, titration is the most frequently used analytical method in simple matrices such as salt whereas urinary iodine is almost exclusively measured by an old method based on the Sandell-Kolthoff reaction or inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry [10]. Other techniques available for iodine detection include for example ion chromatography [11], spectrophotometric methods [12], flow injection analysis [13], and voltammetric [14] and potentiometric methods [15]. Many of the methods meet the requirements for effective determination of iodine, but only a few can be carried out without sample pretreatment [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%