2014
DOI: 10.5935/0103-104.20140008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Judicialization of health and public hearing convened by the Supreme Court in 2009: what has changed since then?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The hypothesis that the number of lawsuits increased because of the limited incorporation of new medicines into the SUS is a misconception when we consider that despite the changes in the policy of technological incorporation within the SUS with the creation of Conitec [15], which made the analysis and incorporation of new technologies into the SUS more transparent, responsive, and democratic [14], the number of lawsuits continues to increase in Brazil. Therefore, the argument that the increase in the number of lawsuits is often attributed to the failed or delayed incorporation of new technologies into the SUS is unjustified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The hypothesis that the number of lawsuits increased because of the limited incorporation of new medicines into the SUS is a misconception when we consider that despite the changes in the policy of technological incorporation within the SUS with the creation of Conitec [15], which made the analysis and incorporation of new technologies into the SUS more transparent, responsive, and democratic [14], the number of lawsuits continues to increase in Brazil. Therefore, the argument that the increase in the number of lawsuits is often attributed to the failed or delayed incorporation of new technologies into the SUS is unjustified.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this increase follows an increase in the number of lawsuits at the federal level [14, 26], it has not been observed in other states such as Rio Grande do Sul [27]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Gomes et al 37 alertam para um emaranhado de interesses que podem ter motivado os discursos de atores representantes de diferentes segmentos durante a audiência. Mesmo assim, houve consenso no debate de alguns pontos, a destacar: a R. Dir.…”
Section: A Audiência Pública N 4 De 2009unclassified