2017
DOI: 10.5123/s1679-49742017000300004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Adaptação e validação do Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture em versão brasileira eletrônica

Abstract: the results confirmed the validity and reliability of the instrument with adequate psychometric properties for the assessment of patient's safety culture in Brazilian hospitals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
9

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
24
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…CFA showed the fit of the original 12-dimension model to range from acceptable (CFI = 0.92 and TLI = 0.91) to satisfactory (RMSEA = 0.04) (90%CI: 0.042-0.046) ( Table 2). That result is similar to those of international studies 10,12,13,18,19,20,21,22,23,24 , but differs from the findings of a previous Brazilian study 18 concerning the RMSEA value ( Table 2).…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…CFA showed the fit of the original 12-dimension model to range from acceptable (CFI = 0.92 and TLI = 0.91) to satisfactory (RMSEA = 0.04) (90%CI: 0.042-0.046) ( Table 2). That result is similar to those of international studies 10,12,13,18,19,20,21,22,23,24 , but differs from the findings of a previous Brazilian study 18 concerning the RMSEA value ( Table 2).…”
Section: Confirmatory Factor Analysissupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The Cronbach's alpha coefficients estimated for the original 12-factor model ranged from 0.41 ("overall perceptions of patient safety") to 0.91 ("frequency of events reported") ( Table 1). Table 1 shows the results obtained in this study and in other international studies 8,10,12,13,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25 . In four dimensions, the alpha value was below 0.60 ("overall perceptions of patient safety" = 0.41; "staffing" = 0.46; "teamwork across units" = 0.45; "non-punitive response to error" = 0.54) ( Table 1).…”
Section: Internal Consistencymentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another strategy would be the exclusion of low-performance questions 14 , however the instrument would have less items than the HSOPS originally developed. A new version of the HSOPS was validated for the Brazilian context and developed in an interface of electronic application 17 . The reliability of the instrument was high (α=0.92), possibly avoiding the interpretation limitations of the version applied in this investigation 14 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…O instrumento utilizado neste projeto foi objeto de validações para culturas em diversos países, avaliações e os seus resultados foram mencionados em publicações científicas para aprimorar a segurança do paciente. Dentre eles, estudos realizados em São Paulo (Clinco, 2007), Taiwan (Chen & Li, 2010), Irã (Moghri, et al, 2012), Goiás (Tobias, Bezerra, Moreira, Paranguá & Silva, 2016), Rio Grande do Norte (Andrade, et al, 2017) e Paraná (Cruz, et al, 2018) demonstram a necessidade de traçar abordagens favoráveis à adesão da população à pesquisa e ainda fortalecer principalmente a comunicação, a resposta não punitiva ao erro, a interface com os gestores, o trabalho em equipe e a inserção destes profissionais nos processos norteadores de ações e novos Research, Society and Development, v. 9, n. 4, e184942650, 2020(CC BY 4.0) | ISSN 2525-3409 | DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i4.2650 4 programas. A vulnerabilidade destes aspectos foi identificada como limitante para a promoção da segurança do paciente.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified