Theoretical procedures of the cross-cultural adaptation process of the Child Mania Rating Scale - Parent Version (CMRS-P) for the Brazilian context

Meyer, Tharso de Souza; Figueiredo, Vera Lúcia Marques de; Youngstrom, Eric A.; Cardoso, Taiane de Azevedo; Araújo, Jaciana Marlova Gonçalves; Mondin, Thaíse Campos; Osório, Flávia de Lima; Andretta, Ilana; Souza, Luciano Dias de Mattos

doi:10.47626/2237-6089-2021-0390

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is the second non-English adaptation of the CMRS, following the Brazilian version published in 2021. 24 The Brazilian version was translated and reviewed by 15 experts and 21 parents/guardians of a representative children/adolescent population. The authors showed a content validity coefficient of 0.95 and an agreement index above 86%.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development of a Korean Version of the Child Mania Rating Scale: Korean Validity and Reliability Study

Chi,

Mok,

et al. 2023

Psychiatry Investig

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective Clinical rating scales are essential in psychiatry. The Young Mania Rating Scale is the gold standard for assessing mania. However, increased attention to pediatric bipolar disorder has led to the development of the Child Mania Rating Scale (CMRS), which is a parent-reported rating scale designed to assess mania in children and adolescents. This study aimed to translate the CMRS into Korean and assess the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the CMRS (K-CMRS).Methods The original English version of the CMRS has been translated into Korean. We enrolled 33 patients with bipolar disorder and 26 patients with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). All participants were evaluated using the translated K-CMRS, Mood Disorder Questionnaire (MDQ), and ADHD Rating Scale.Results The Cronbach’s α was 0.907. Correlation analyses between K-CMRS and MDQ scores yielded significant positive correlations (r=0.529, p=0.009). However, the factor analysis was unsuccessful. The total K-CMRS scores of bipolar disorder and ADHD patients were compared. However, the differences were not statistically significant.Conclusion The K-CMRS showed good internal consistency and reliability. The correlation between the K-CMRS and MDQ scores verifies its validity. The K-CMRS was designed to assess and score manic symptoms in children and adolescents but had difficulties in differentiating between bipolar disorder and ADHD. It is a valuable tool for evaluating the presence and severity of manic symptoms in pediatric patients with bipolar disorder.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%