2010
DOI: 10.4322/rbpv.01901004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudo comparativo dos métodos diagnósticos para Leishmaniose Visceral em cães oriundos de Ilha Solteira, SP

Abstract: The purpose of the present work was a comparative study of diagnostic methods for Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis (CVL) using serological methods, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), histochemical (HE) and immunohistochemical (IMHC) tests using spleen, lymph node and liver canine tissues. In addition, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was done in blood and in tissues in order to compare and confirm no conclusive and negative diagnosis by the methods above. For t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
8
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the tests, the positivism rates for CVL were the following: 71.6% (48/67), 65.7% (44/67), 65.7% (44/67) and 55.2% (37/67) by ELISA-SE, ELISA-rk39, IFAT and RDT-rK39, respectively. Furthermore, the results showed that the serum prevalence rates were higher in symptomatic rather than in asymptomatic dogs (Table 1) in accordance to the results of Assis et al (2010) and Queiroz et al (2010), who compared different diagnostic tests in a group of CVL positive dogs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to the tests, the positivism rates for CVL were the following: 71.6% (48/67), 65.7% (44/67), 65.7% (44/67) and 55.2% (37/67) by ELISA-SE, ELISA-rk39, IFAT and RDT-rK39, respectively. Furthermore, the results showed that the serum prevalence rates were higher in symptomatic rather than in asymptomatic dogs (Table 1) in accordance to the results of Assis et al (2010) and Queiroz et al (2010), who compared different diagnostic tests in a group of CVL positive dogs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The Kappa indexes of agreement (Table 2) between both serological methods (ELISA-SE × IFAT) were considered good in the symptomatic (87.3%, k= 0.6867) and excellent in the asymptomatic group (91.7%, k= 0.8333). Similarly, Assis et al (2010) observed also a good concordance between ELISA-SE and IFAT, indicating that either ELISA or IFAT can be recommended for CVL diagnosis during epidemiological surveys.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, the serological tests of these animals were repeated in our laboratory using an indirect ELISA test and IFAT (indirect fluorescent antibody test) according to Oliveira et al (2008), and molecular analysis of the blood were also performed by PCR (polymerase chain reaction) according to standard protocol used by Assis et al (2010). All these tests were again positive for CVL.…”
Section: Cvl Infected Dogs (G1 and G2 Group)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular tools for the diagnosis of Leishmania infections are routinely employed for humans, vectors, and wild and domestic mammalian samples [6,13,16–17]. This intracellular parasite is heterogeneously distributed in mammal tissues and is usually described in low parasite loads, at least in wild mammals [2].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%