2010
DOI: 10.4322/actalb.02203003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Which is the best environment for the development of the early life stages of fish during the dry season?

Abstract: Aim:The main objective of this study was to investigate the quality of habitats for early life stages of fish in the Jacaré-Guaçu River, during the dry phase; Methods: For assessing the quality of the habitats for the development of early life stages, the relative condition factor was applied to the juveniles of five species of fishes, captured in four different habitats (reservoir, floodplain lake, main river, and tributary). The juveniles were caught in macrophytes of the littoral zone by a rectangular sieve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found that Moenkhausia forestii exhibits a compressed body and low body depression. These characteristics are expected to occur in fish that occupy lentic environments and facilitate occupation and establishment in structured environments, such as macrophyte stands (Esguícero & Arcifa, 2010;Oliveira et al, 2010;Prado et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that Moenkhausia forestii exhibits a compressed body and low body depression. These characteristics are expected to occur in fish that occupy lentic environments and facilitate occupation and establishment in structured environments, such as macrophyte stands (Esguícero & Arcifa, 2010;Oliveira et al, 2010;Prado et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characiformes H. eques, M. forestii, S. calliurus and S. notomelas were characterized by compressed bodies, which are expected in fish that occupy lentic environments and enable increased efficiency in vertical movements (Gatz, 1979;Watson & Balon, 1984), because this characteristic provides less resistance to perform maneuvers such as pitch (dorso-ventral movements) or yaw (lateral movements) (Alexander, 1967). Thus, this body shape may facilitate the occupation of structured environments such as macrophyte stands in areas of low water flow (Esguícero & Arcifa, 2010). Nevertheless, they showed larger anal fins, which implies in greater maneuverability and stabilization of movement (Breda, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary host, N. beckfordi, mainly inhabits slower moving backwater bays (in this case ≤0.023 m/s), swimming at intermediate depths (in this case observed at estimates of about ~5–15 cm depth in the 18 cm depth recorded in November 2017 and ~5–30 cm depth in the 46 cm depth recorded in May 2018) in the water column and feeding on plant material, occasionally rising to the surface to feed on food items that fall onto the water surface (Chondoma, 1979). Species in the genera Hyphessobrycon Durbin & Eigenmann, 1908 and Moenkhausia Eigenmann, 1903 are also commonly found in these backwater bays (Barros, 2012; Esguícero & Arcifa, 2010) and in association with aquatic vegetation (Agostinho et al., 2007; Declerck et al., 2005). Both of these habitat characteristics are associated with a higher concentration of aquatic invertebrates (Thomaz et al., 2008; Vieira et al., 2007), the main dietary component of these two genera that also both feed in intermediate depths in the water column (Cunha et al., 2007; Lima et al., 2008), and places them consistently alongside the primary host N. beckfordi in these habitats (as also found here Table S2) and therefore exposed to potential settlement by cymothoid mancae .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%