2012
DOI: 10.4025/actascianimsci.v34i4.15271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Since every year public and private companies bring many genotypes of maize to the market, the suitability of these genotypes for the production of silage should be evaluated. Current study evaluates the agronomic and chemical characteristics of early-normal cycle maize genotypes as well as assesses whether the genetic bases (single, double, and triple hybrids, as well as varieties and intervarietal genotypes) and the grain hardness (hard, semi-hard and dentate) modify the indication of maize genotyp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
1
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
3
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The results on the crude protein content are above those reported to be 5.13-5.93% in Aydoğan (2010), 5.2-6.5% in Aşar (2014), 4.2-7.2% in Safdarian et al (2014), 6.94-7.93% in Anonim (2015, and 6.5-8.1% in Han (2016) but below 6.72-11.26% in Kirendibi (2015), 6.7-11.5% in Ferreira (2015), and 10.4-10.9% in Row et al (2015). However, they are consistent with 5.11-11.16% in Balmuk (2012), 5.2-9.06% in Özata et al (2012), 6.3-10.7% in Martin et al (2012), 7.7-8.8% in Ferreira et al (2014, and 7.7-8.8% in Karaalp (2015).…”
Section: Crude Protein Ratio (%)supporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results on the crude protein content are above those reported to be 5.13-5.93% in Aydoğan (2010), 5.2-6.5% in Aşar (2014), 4.2-7.2% in Safdarian et al (2014), 6.94-7.93% in Anonim (2015, and 6.5-8.1% in Han (2016) but below 6.72-11.26% in Kirendibi (2015), 6.7-11.5% in Ferreira (2015), and 10.4-10.9% in Row et al (2015). However, they are consistent with 5.11-11.16% in Balmuk (2012), 5.2-9.06% in Özata et al (2012), 6.3-10.7% in Martin et al (2012), 7.7-8.8% in Ferreira et al (2014, and 7.7-8.8% in Karaalp (2015).…”
Section: Crude Protein Ratio (%)supporting
confidence: 76%
“…The results on the NDF rate are above those reported to be 46.3-47% in Karaalp (2015), 43.7-47.5% in Row et al (2015), and 33.89-43.94% in Anonim (2015 but below those reported be 48.0-65.8% in Martin et al (2012), 57.50-73.85% in Balmuk (2012, and 52.1-59% in Safdarian et al(2014). However, they are consistent with 49-60% in Öner et al (2011aÖner et al ( ), 47.5-58.9% in Özata et al (2012Öner et al ( ), and 41.8-58.8% in Ferreira (2015.…”
Section: Ndf (%)mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Menor valor de EE foi observado na menor dose de adubo utilizada e quando foi realizada somente no milho. Valores de EE devem estar em torno de 5%, maiores que isso limita o consumo animal (Martin, et al, 2012). Valores elevados de EE causam problemas de função ruminal devido ao poder deletério dos ácidos graxos insaturados (Xin & Yu, 2013).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…van soest (1994), discorrendo sobre os teores de FDN e FDA afirmou que os níveis adequados para o consumo animal devem ser respectivamente abaixo de 60% e 40%, o que também enquadra as silagens de todos os tratamentos aqui avaliados maior que silagens com teores baixos de EE. Os teores de EE encontrados neste trabalho (5,86% a 7,94%) estão acima dos encontrados por BiaGGioni et al (2009) de 3,90% a 5,27%, e Martin et al (2012) entre 2,0% e 3,8%, ambos estudos com silagem de planta inteira proveniente de diferentes híbridos de milho, refletindo a qualidade dos grãos do híbrido estudado em comparação com os dos demais autores. Normalmente essa variação de teores de EE também são atribuídas ao cultivar utilizado e não às condições de cultivo.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified