2012
DOI: 10.4025/actasciagron.v34i1.13115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Updating the ranking of the coefficients of variation from maize experiments

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The objective of this study was to update the ranking of the coefficients of variation (CVs) from maize experiments and evaluate the accuracy of the data from the latest Brazilian publications. We rank-ordered the CVs for grain yield, plant and ear heights, number of ears per plant, and weight of commercial ears, except for the weight of 100 grains. The data were obtained from 143 scientific papers published from 2005 to 2010. The classification was based on the average (m) and standard deviation (SD… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
19
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is of paramount importance for obtaining genetic gains in terms of hybrid crosses among populations since the success of the breeding program depends on variability to optimize the selection process (Machado, 2014). For all analyzed variables, the variation coefficients were at or below the ideal described by Hallauer et al (2010) and Fritsche-Neto et al (2012) and revealed high experimental precision.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 49%
“…This is of paramount importance for obtaining genetic gains in terms of hybrid crosses among populations since the success of the breeding program depends on variability to optimize the selection process (Machado, 2014). For all analyzed variables, the variation coefficients were at or below the ideal described by Hallauer et al (2010) and Fritsche-Neto et al (2012) and revealed high experimental precision.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 49%
“…The experimental coefficients of variation (CVs) obtained in the first experiment (2011/2012 harvest) were 11.23%, 3.71% and 5.59% for yield, plant height and ear height, respectively. In the second experiment (2012/2013 harvest), the respective CVs reached 14.17%, 4.46% and 7.34%, indicating satisfactory experimental precision (SCAPIM et al, 1995;FRITSCHE-NETO et al, 2012). The adoption of lattice was also verified as a satisfactory experimental design because all of the estimators of the design efficiency were greater than 100%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, the genotypes presented high productivity estimates, since average productivity in Brazil is about 4.2 t ha -1 (Lyra et al, 2014). The variation coefficients for all variables were within the normal range, revealing good experimental precision (Hallauer et al, 2010;Fritsche-Neto et al, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%