2015
DOI: 10.3916/c45-2015-11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The article analyzes the results of the international survey «Synthesis of Media Literacy Education and Media Criticism in the Modern World», conducted by the authors in May-July 2014. 64 media educators, media critics, and researchers in the field of media education and media culture participated in the survey, representing 18 countries: the USA, the UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Ireland, Spain, Portugal, Sweden, Finland, Greece, Cyprus, Hungary, Ukraine, Serbia, Turkey, and Russia. Analysis of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of the data in Table 1 demonstrates that the majority of the respondents are involved into the process of researching, designing curriculum, developing policy documents, teaching material and resources (83.1 %) and teaching media studies course (70.8 %), almost half of them teacher occupies with training course and teaching media literacy integrated in other subject area. In agreement with the tendency of the synthesis of media literacy education and media criticism, as found in one of the previous expert surveys (Fedorov & Levitskaya, 2015), about one third of the respondents acknowledged that they were also involved in mass media criticism. Part of experts (12.3 %) added other relevant activities (consultation, expertise, speeches at academic conferences, writing monographs, and study guides on media literacy education).…”
Section: Instrumentssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Analysis of the data in Table 1 demonstrates that the majority of the respondents are involved into the process of researching, designing curriculum, developing policy documents, teaching material and resources (83.1 %) and teaching media studies course (70.8 %), almost half of them teacher occupies with training course and teaching media literacy integrated in other subject area. In agreement with the tendency of the synthesis of media literacy education and media criticism, as found in one of the previous expert surveys (Fedorov & Levitskaya, 2015), about one third of the respondents acknowledged that they were also involved in mass media criticism. Part of experts (12.3 %) added other relevant activities (consultation, expertise, speeches at academic conferences, writing monographs, and study guides on media literacy education).…”
Section: Instrumentssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…There is a considerable number of Russian and foreign researchers dealing with the problems of media culture and media education: Akgunduz, Akinoglu (Akgunduz, Akinoglu, 2016), S. Arévalo (Arévalo, 2018), A.V. Fedorov (Fedorov, 2014;2015;Fedorov et al, 2018;Fedorov, Levitskaya, 2015), I.V. Chelysheva (Chelysheva, 2017), Sánchez-Moya (Sánchez-Moya, 2015), F. Yus (Yus, 2017) and others (Gálik, 2017;Petranová et al, 2017, etc.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent Russian studies pursued the analysis of key approaches to media education in Russia and Europe [Chelysheva, 2002;Fedorov, 2008;Fedorov, Levitskaya, 2015]. Nevertheless, according to Prof. A. Fedorov, "Dr. Sharikov's scientific contribution was actually the first "media education manifesto" in the Russian pedagogical discourse" [Fedorov, 2015, 171].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%