2020
DOI: 10.37496/rbz4920190247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storage length interacts with maturity to affect nutrient availability in unprocessed flint corn silage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, at concentrations below 0.10% DM, they did not compromise the nutritional quality of corn silage (McDonald et al, 1991). Bueno et al (2020), who evaluated corn silage stored for 180 days, found no effect on the levels of butyric acid, corroborating the findings of the current study. Ammonia-N and non-protein N (A fraction) concentrations increased linearly, whereas crude protein and soluble true protein (B1 and B2 fractions) decreased linearly with storage (Tables 1 and 2), because of the proteolysis, which causes hydrolysis of protein peptide bonds through the action of enzymes present in plant cells generating non-protein nitrogenous compounds such as ammonia, nitrates, nitrites, free amino acids, and peptides (McDonald et al, 1991).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, at concentrations below 0.10% DM, they did not compromise the nutritional quality of corn silage (McDonald et al, 1991). Bueno et al (2020), who evaluated corn silage stored for 180 days, found no effect on the levels of butyric acid, corroborating the findings of the current study. Ammonia-N and non-protein N (A fraction) concentrations increased linearly, whereas crude protein and soluble true protein (B1 and B2 fractions) decreased linearly with storage (Tables 1 and 2), because of the proteolysis, which causes hydrolysis of protein peptide bonds through the action of enzymes present in plant cells generating non-protein nitrogenous compounds such as ammonia, nitrates, nitrites, free amino acids, and peptides (McDonald et al, 1991).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…As the period of time for which the silages were stored increased, the DM content of the maize silage decreased and the effluent increased (Table 1). This may be the result of having harvested the crop before it reached a dry matter content of less than 300 g/kg (Bueno et al, 2020). Harvesting the crop too soon may have resulted in lower production per area and more intense fermentation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When processed through a conventional kernel processor (2 mm roll gap), Ferraretto et al [36] reported numerically greater processing scores in bm3 gene mutation and dual-purpose maize silage hybrids harvested at a late maturity compared to the same hybrids harvested at early maturity. Bueno et al [44] observed greater kernel processing scores in unprocessed WPMS harvested at 30% DM compared to 40% DM.…”
Section: Silage Fermentation Profile and Nutrient Compositionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…At 240 d of storage, differences between treatment combinations were diminished, with isSD being greater in early maturity silage processed through a 1 mm roll gap compared to late maturity silage processed through a 3 mm roll gap. Ruminal starch digestibility is often found to be greater in early maturity compared to late maturity WPMS [36,39,44]. In a meta-analysis by Ferraretto and Shaver [5], a reduction in total-tract starch digestibility was observed for diets containing WPMS with >40% DM.…”
Section: Silage Fermentation Profile and Nutrient Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O grau de estabilização é obtido com maior rapidez nos silos experimentais que nos comerciais, já que as condições para que ocorra o processo de fermentação anaeróbica se dá em menor tempo alterando os resultados. No Brasil, foram realizados poucos experimentos (PEDROSO et al, 2014;BUENO et al, 2020;MARTIN et al, 2012;TAVARES et al, 2009;TAVARES et al, 2019;OLIVEIRA et al, 2011;BUSO et al, 2018;CRUZ et al, 2019;NEUMANN et al, 2007;OLIVEIRA et al, 2013;MOMBACH et al, 2019) buscando estudar os microssilos experimentais utilizados para avaliação da silagem que se aproxime das condições de campo.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified