2020
DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020ao4948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automatic segmentation of brain tumors in magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: Objective: To develop a computational algorithm applied to magnetic resonance imaging for automatic segmentation of brain tumors. Methods: A total of 130 magnetic resonance images were used in the T1c, T2 and FSPRG T1C sequences and in the axial, sagittal and coronal planes of patients with brain cancer. The algorithms employed contrast correction, histogram normalization and binarization techniques to disconnect adjacent structures from the brain and enhance the region of interest. Automatic segmentation was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2019, Mascarenhas et al [21] introduced a histogram normalization, contrast correction and binarization strategy for decoupling nearby structures from the brain. Besides, they enhancing the region of interest of brain tumors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2019, Mascarenhas et al [21] introduced a histogram normalization, contrast correction and binarization strategy for decoupling nearby structures from the brain. Besides, they enhancing the region of interest of brain tumors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, segmentation is approached from conventional image processing techniques. For example, Mascarenhas et al [23] define a histogram equalization method, intensity adjustment, binarization, and segmentation through the brain region's coordinates. On the other hand, in a more robust approach, Chen et al [24] use a support vector machine and an extended Kalman filter, achieving close to 98% accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%