2019
DOI: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2019ao4521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Drug interactions in maternal intensive care: prevalence, risk factors, and potential risk medications

Abstract: Objective: To characterize severe potential drug interactions in maternal intensive care, and to determine their frequency, risk factors and potential risk medications. Methods: An observational and longitudinal study conducted between December 2014 and December 2015 in a maternal intensive care unit. Clinical data were collected and severe potential drug interactions were identified on pregnant inpatients. The drug interactions were classified by type, prevalence and e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a study by Pessoa et al published in 2019, nearly one-third of pregnant women experienced at least one severe pDDI and were subjected to more than two-thirds of the hospital stay. A significant number of pharmaceuticals provided during the hospitalization period and past medication usage before admission were shown to be risk factors for severe pDDIs, which were present in around 33.9% of patients [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a study by Pessoa et al published in 2019, nearly one-third of pregnant women experienced at least one severe pDDI and were subjected to more than two-thirds of the hospital stay. A significant number of pharmaceuticals provided during the hospitalization period and past medication usage before admission were shown to be risk factors for severe pDDIs, which were present in around 33.9% of patients [ 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, differences in medication regimen in the outpatient compared to the inpatient setting might further explain discrepancies in PIMCs. According to a meta-analysis and systematic review, 33% of all hospitalized general patients received at least one PIMC, [ 32 ] whereby PIMC prevalence ranged from 16.3% [ 33 ] to 71.1% [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparando a estudos prévios que investigaram a ocorrência de IMp em UTI, a prevalência encontrada neste estudo foi similar a de estudos prévios que variou de 58 a 96% [6][7][8][9][10] . O perfil medicamentoso relacionado às IMp deste estudo corrobora com achados de recente revisão sistemática com metanálise 6 e de outros estudos observacionais [11][12][13][14][15][16] que objetivaram avaliar IMp em UTI.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…A prevalência de IMp em UTI tem sido elevada, variando de 58 a 96% [6][7][8][9][10] . Estudos 6,11 têm reportado que os principais fatores de risco e associados a estas taxas envolvem ser do sexo masculino, idade maior de 60 anos, uso de polifarmácia incluindo algumas classes de medicamentos específicas (antiagregantes plaquetários, antidiabéticos, antiarrítmicos, diuréticos, inibidores de bomba de prótons, hipnóticos/sedativos e antiepilépticos) e maior tempo de internação 6,11 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation