The Rationalization of Leisure

Weinberg, Lindsay

doi:10.25158/l8.1.3

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…1 The concerns outlined here do not constitute the totality of critiques being levelled against AI, but pertain, particularly, to those with most direct relevance to the arguments under discussion here. Other concerns include those around transparency and accountability (for a critical account see Adams 2020), and labour (see Weinberg 2019; Crawford and Joler 2018), as well as other discontents outlined and critiqued in this issue.…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Can artificial intelligence be decolonized?

Adams

2021

Interdisciplinary Science Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

AI is altering not only local and global society, but what it means to be human, or, to be counted as such. In the midst of concerns about the ethics of AI, calls are emerging for AI to be decolonized. What does the decolonization of AI imply? This article explores this question, writing from the post-colony of South Africa where the imbrications of race, colonialism and technology have been experienced and debated in ways that hold global meaning and relevance for this discussion. Proceeding in two parts, this article explores the notion of de/coloniality and its emphasis on undoing legacies of colonialism and logics of race, before critiquing two major discontents of AI today: ethics as a colonial rationality and racializing dividing practices. This article develops a critical basis from which to articulate a question that sits exterior to current AI practice and its critical discourses: can AI be decolonized?

show abstract

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%