2019
DOI: 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Simulated Geomagnetic Activity on Myocardial Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury in Rats

Abstract: ObjectiveTo study the response of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury (MI/RI) in rats to simulated geomagnetic activity.MethodsIn a simulated strong geomagnetic outbreak, the MI/RI rat models were radiated, and their area of myocardial infarction, hemodynamic parameters, creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), melatonin, and troponin I values were measured after a 24-hour intervention.ResultsOur analysis indicates that the concentrations of troponin I in the geomagnetic shielding+operation group … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It affects heart rate variability, increased blood viscosity, coagulation, and platelet aggregation [7]. In an artificially simulated magnetic field experiment with laboratory mice, the difference in myocardial ischemiareperfusion injury was observed depending on different magnetic field conditions [8]. The study revealed that myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury was greater in mice exposed to an artificial geomagnetic field than in those isolated from the magnetic field [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It affects heart rate variability, increased blood viscosity, coagulation, and platelet aggregation [7]. In an artificially simulated magnetic field experiment with laboratory mice, the difference in myocardial ischemiareperfusion injury was observed depending on different magnetic field conditions [8]. The study revealed that myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury was greater in mice exposed to an artificial geomagnetic field than in those isolated from the magnetic field [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%