2018
DOI: 10.20945/2359-3997000000037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serum TSH level stability after 5 years in euthyroid adults at low risk for thyroid dysfunction

Abstract: Objective: To evaluate changes in thyroid function after 5 years, the interval proposed for new assessment, in initially euthyroid adults. Subjects and methods: Initially, 1,426 apparently healthy adults considered low risk for thyroid dysfunction, were evaluated by measurement of TSH. After 5 years, 1,215 (85.2%) subjects were reevaluated. Results: After 5 years, four subjects were receiving levothyroxine (L-T4) replacement therapy and 25 others had TSH > 4 mIU/L, only two of them with TSH > 10 mIU/L. All of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(34) recommended that individuals with TSH levels above the upper limit of normal should be reassessed every 6-12 months to exclude transient TSH level increase. Individuals with heritable longevity and exceptional longevity have been shown to have higher serum TSH (34)(35)(36). Thus, we may speculate that higher serum TSH is beneficial for older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(34) recommended that individuals with TSH levels above the upper limit of normal should be reassessed every 6-12 months to exclude transient TSH level increase. Individuals with heritable longevity and exceptional longevity have been shown to have higher serum TSH (34)(35)(36). Thus, we may speculate that higher serum TSH is beneficial for older adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fourth, the association of uptake intensity, or SUV as a continuous variable, with risk of thyroid dysfunction was not assessed. Lastly, while the longitudinal study design is one of the main strengths of our study, the duration of follow-up (median, 2.5 years) was relatively short compared to other longitudinal studies on progression of thyroid diseases [28,29]. An extended follow-up is needed for a better understanding of the prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%