2010
DOI: 10.1667/rr2083.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Radiation and Smoking Effects on Lung Cancer Incidence among Atomic Bomb Survivors

Abstract: While radiation increases the risk of lung cancer among members of the Life Span Study (LSS) cohort of atomic-bomb survivors, there are still important questions about the nature of its interaction with smoking, the predominant cause of lung cancer. Among 105,404 LSS subjects, 1,803 primary lung cancer incident cases were identified for the period 1958–1999. Individual smoking history information and the latest radiation dose estimates were utilized to investigate the joint effects of radiation and smoking on … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
83
2
Order By: Relevance
“…43 Evidence from the LSS cohort also confirms that smoking significantly increases the excess risk of lung cancer. 111 …”
Section: Irradiation Of the Chest Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…43 Evidence from the LSS cohort also confirms that smoking significantly increases the excess risk of lung cancer. 111 …”
Section: Irradiation Of the Chest Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weiss et al reported a relative risk of bladder cancer death of approximately 2 after exposure to an average of 2.2 Gy with no dependence on years since exposure; the study did not attempt to control for smoking (6). In studies of lung cancer incidence and smoking among the A-bomb survivors, Pierce et al (44) reported statistical evidence to reject an additive model, but not a multiplicative model, while Furukawa et al (15), using additional follow-up data, rejected both additive and multiplicative models in favor of a generalized interaction model in which multiplicative effects were observed among light smokers, but additive effects were observed among heavy smokers. Lung cancer, however, is more strongly associated with smoking than urothelial carcinoma and those studies had many more incident cases, which afforded greater power to detect interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns that smoking or other unaccounted for factors may confound or modify established bladder radiation risk estimates have been voiced in recent UNSCEAR and ICRP reports, and in the last LSS cancer incidence report (1,(12)(13)(14). Recently, evidence of ionizing radiation and smoking joint effects have been reported for lung cancer in the LSS, which further raises the possibility that lifestyle factors could modify bladder cancer risk estimates (15). The purpose of this study was to estimate the ionizing radiation risk of the most common subtype of bladder cancer (urothelial carcinoma) in the LSS cohort using the same methods as those used to derive the most recent ionizing radiation risk estimates, but with the inclusion of lifestyle factors to establish whether urothelial carcinoma radiation risk estimates were either confounded or modified by lifestyle factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the BEIR VII lung cancer model, a recent study has applied a pure ERR method to examine the effect of the interaction between smoking and radiation exposure (33). However, this analysis examined the lung cancer incidence among the Japanese atomic bomb survivors.…”
Section: Special Report: Radiation Risk Models In Cancer Screening Simentioning
confidence: 99%