2019
DOI: 10.1590/s1982-21702019000400026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Proposal for Modeling and Implementing an Integrated System for Brazilian Cadastres According to Iso 19152:2012 Land Administration Domain Model

Abstract: This content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing literature indicates that the viability of LADM for 3D digital cadastre was investigated in various jurisdictions around the world (Janečka et al, 2018). These jurisdictions include Brazil (Purificação et al, 2019), China (Ying et al, 2018;Yu et al, 2017;Zhuo et al, 2015), Czech Souček, 2017, 2016), Croatia (Mader et al, 2018;Mađer et al, 2015;Vučić et al, 2017Vučić et al, , 2013, Greece (Gkeli et al, 2018;Kalogianni, 2015;Kitsakis et al, 2018), Israel (Felus et al, 2014;van Oosterom, 2014), Korea (Kim et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2015), Serbia (Radulovic et al, 2018;Radulović et al, 2017aRadulović et al, , 2017b, Malaysia (Jamil et al, 2017;Rajabifard et al, 2018a;Zulkifli et al, 2015Zulkifli et al, , 2014bZulkifli et al, , 2014a, the Netherlands (Stoter et al, 2013), Poland (Góźdź and van Oosterom, 2016), Russia (Vandysheva et al, 2011b, 2011a), Trinidad and Tobago (Griffith-Charles et al, 2016, and Turkey (Alkan and Polat, 2018;Aydinoglu and Bovkir, 2017;Polat and Alkan, 2018). Although LADM provides a comprehensive set of entities for modelling legal concepts, physical elements can be linked to LADM entities externally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing literature indicates that the viability of LADM for 3D digital cadastre was investigated in various jurisdictions around the world (Janečka et al, 2018). These jurisdictions include Brazil (Purificação et al, 2019), China (Ying et al, 2018;Yu et al, 2017;Zhuo et al, 2015), Czech Souček, 2017, 2016), Croatia (Mader et al, 2018;Mađer et al, 2015;Vučić et al, 2017Vučić et al, , 2013, Greece (Gkeli et al, 2018;Kalogianni, 2015;Kitsakis et al, 2018), Israel (Felus et al, 2014;van Oosterom, 2014), Korea (Kim et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2015), Serbia (Radulovic et al, 2018;Radulović et al, 2017aRadulović et al, , 2017b, Malaysia (Jamil et al, 2017;Rajabifard et al, 2018a;Zulkifli et al, 2015Zulkifli et al, , 2014bZulkifli et al, , 2014a, the Netherlands (Stoter et al, 2013), Poland (Góźdź and van Oosterom, 2016), Russia (Vandysheva et al, 2011b, 2011a), Trinidad and Tobago (Griffith-Charles et al, 2016, and Turkey (Alkan and Polat, 2018;Aydinoglu and Bovkir, 2017;Polat and Alkan, 2018). Although LADM provides a comprehensive set of entities for modelling legal concepts, physical elements can be linked to LADM entities externally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%