2018
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-86212018000100212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Resumoenvolvimento efetivo dos usuários no processo de projeto (PP) traz diversos benefícios para esse processo, como a captura de suas reais necessidades e a legitimação das decisões de projeto, dentre outras descritas na literatura. Entretanto, os métodos e instrumentos para o emprego do codesign no PP ainda são incipientes e pouco divulgados, o que dificulta a disseminação dessa abordagem. O objetivo do presente artigo é, portanto, levantar métodos e instrumentos já utilizados em codesign com usuários, por … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
5
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Another term used for participatory or collaborative design is the co-design, which was researched by Caixeta and Fabrício [6] regarding the methods that involve it. Co-design is the project process that searchs to understand and learn from the user his / her expertise regarding the theme addressed in a particular project and context [7,8,9], or still, defined as Experience-based Co-design [10].…”
Section: Collaborative Projects With Bandvi: the Methodology Used And Its Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another term used for participatory or collaborative design is the co-design, which was researched by Caixeta and Fabrício [6] regarding the methods that involve it. Co-design is the project process that searchs to understand and learn from the user his / her expertise regarding the theme addressed in a particular project and context [7,8,9], or still, defined as Experience-based Co-design [10].…”
Section: Collaborative Projects With Bandvi: the Methodology Used And Its Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the conclusions of the authors is that users are more useful in the process in the initial stages of the project, and subsequent steps require a more accurate technical knowledge, making the users themselves, little contribute to the evolution of the project. Besides that, users directly involved with the program routine of a specific project theme are more useful to the process than are occasional users [6]. Therefore, the associates themselves and those who frequent more the institution would be the most appropriate users and considering that there are spaces shared by both adults and children, both participated in the process.…”
Section: Collaborative Projects With Bandvi: the Methodology Used And Its Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8], this participation of users in the design of projects allows in-depth discussions about the different existing needs. By using Co-design it is possible to promote a common project language so that users and project professionals can understand and express themselves [9]. According to the users' daily activities, project possibilities are defined and, in this way, constant changes are made between architects and users for the progress of the project.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Carneiro et al (2011), this participation of users in the design of projects allows in-depth discussions about the different existing needs. By using codesign it is possible to promote a common project language so that users and project professionals can understand and express themselves (Caixeta and Fabricio 2018). According to the users' daily activities, project possibilities are defined and, in this way, constant changes are made between architects and users for the progress of the project.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%