2018
DOI: 10.1590/s1678-86212018000100211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Resumo mentalidade enxuta e a sustentabilidade aplicadas à construção possuem como objetivo, respectivamente, mitigar desperdícios produtivos e diminuir os impactos negativos do setor. Pesquisas recentes afirmam que a aplicação em conjunto dos dois conceitos pode gerar interações e sinergias. O presente trabalho tem o objetivo de identificar como a construção enxuta e a sustentabilidade se relacionam e descrever esse relacionamento por seus pontos sinérgicos, pelas interações negativas e por outros conheciment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies show that environmental management directly improves environmental and social performance, but contributes only indirectly to economic results (Giovanni, 2012). A bibliometric study by Almeida & Picchi (2018) indicates that the theme has gained importance in the last five years, with the United States and Brazil as major contributors. The relationship between the approaches is synergistic between lean construction for sustainability and the strengthened relationship from the alignment of concepts of value and waste.…”
Section: Lean Manufacturing Practices and Business Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies show that environmental management directly improves environmental and social performance, but contributes only indirectly to economic results (Giovanni, 2012). A bibliometric study by Almeida & Picchi (2018) indicates that the theme has gained importance in the last five years, with the United States and Brazil as major contributors. The relationship between the approaches is synergistic between lean construction for sustainability and the strengthened relationship from the alignment of concepts of value and waste.…”
Section: Lean Manufacturing Practices and Business Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planejamento (Andrade & Arrieta, 2011;Campos & Azevedo, 2016Vargas & Formoso, 2019Fabro et al, 2020) Planejamento de Longo Prazo ou Estratégico via LOB e PERT/COM (Andrade & Arrieta, 2011;Campos & Azevedo, 2016Vargas & Formoso, 2019Fabro et al, 2020) Planejamento de Médio Prazo, Tático ou Lookahead Planning (Andrade & Arrieta, 2011;Aziz & Hafez, 2013;;Campos & Azevedo, 2016Vargas & Formoso, 2019Angelim et al, 2019;Fabro et al, 2020) Planejamento de Curto Prazo ou Operacional, Last Planner (Andrade & Arrieta, 2011;Bulhões & Picchi, 2011;Aziz & Hafez, 2013;Pereira & Cachadinha, 2011;Campos & Azevedo, 2016;Vargas & Formoso, 2019;Fabro et al, 2020) 5S (Seiri, Seiton, Seisou, Seiketsu e Shitsuke) (Pereira & Cachadinha, 2011;Salem et al, 2014;Maradzano, Dondofema, & Matope, 2015;Almeida & Picchi, 2018) Gerenciamento Visual, Andon e Transparência (Pereira & Cachadinha, 2011;Salem et al, 2014) Poka-Yoke (à prova de erros) (Koskela, 1992;Tommelein, 2008) Mapeamento do Fluxo de Valor (Bulhões & Picchi, 2011;Pereira & Cachadinha, 2011;Filho et al, 2017;Euphrosino et al, 2019) Kanban (Aziz & Hafez, 2013) Fonte: Autor (2019). 9000, propondo a evolução dos patamares de qualidade da construção civil em quatro níveis, que vai do nível D até o A.…”
Section: Ferramentas Lean Construction Autoresunclassified
“…Uma das alternativas que as empresas têm buscado é a adoção das práticas do Lean Construction [LC], uma vez que possibilitam a otimização de processos (Fabro et al, 2020), redução das perdas e desperdícios (Pheng, Shang, & Peter, 2016;Salgin, Arroyo & Ballard, 2016), ganhos econômicos (Ballard et al, 2008;Ballard, 2009), ganhos com a sustentabilidade (Saggin et al,2015;Almeida & Picchi, 2018), e ganhos ambientais (Golzapoor & Gonzáles, 2013;Ghosh et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…From the results, the need to eliminate or reduce the waste of resources is clear (time, material and money), along with a need to replace the use of reinforced concrete (concrete and steel bars). According to Almeida and Picchi (2018), the light steel frame method can rationalize processes and mitigate waste generation by reducing execution time and material losses when compared to traditional construction methods. Cabeza et al (2014) also mentioned that light steel framing can represent up to a 44% reduction in net CO 2 emissions in relation to a reinforced concrete structure, for example.…”
Section: Reinforced Concrete Framementioning
confidence: 99%