Urban environment quality assessment using a methodology and set of indicators for medium-density neighbourhoods: a comparative case study of Lodi and Genoa

Abstract

One of the main issues in urban sustainability and environmental assessment relates to the selection of indicators (SOCCO, 2000), as there are already many international and recognised core sets (DELSANTE, 2007; LEE; CHAN 2009). Nevertheless, specific local contexts are still in need of appropriate, original indicators and indices (MALCEVSCHI, 2004). This paper deals with the urban quality assessment of medium-density neighbourhoods, which typically include dwellings but also public functions, public spaces and urban infrastructure. The evaluation method is based on a set of 74 indicators used within a specific computational method that is based on scores and defined through pairwise comparison matrices (SOCCO, 2003) to convert qualitative and quantitative evaluations into scores (0 to +100). The assessment involved two different urban contexts in the cities of Lodi and Genoa (Italy). It tests if the set can be used in other sites and cities; the results show significant findings and potentialities, but also some limitations. As significant connections have already been found between urban quality and well-being surveys of inhabitants (ORLANDO, 2007), the possibility to act comparatively in different contexts increases overall research potentiality.

Evaluating Urban Quality: Indicators and Assessment Tools for Smart Sustainable Cities

“…This has been considered the optimum dimension as it can include housing, collective spaces, and services [55]. This study focuses on the neighbourhood planning processes, since they represent an intermediate urban scale, larger than a single building and its immediate surroundings but smaller than an entire town or city-in other words, a spatial unit that is self-sufficient and characterised by social interactions between residents.…”

Understanding the Relationship Between Density and Neighbourhood Environmental Quality – A Framework for Assessing Indian Cities

“…It usually includes dwellings, infrastructure and community services. It is a scale in which multiple disciplines are involved, including environmental, mobility, accessibility, and infrastructure studies and their goals for optimization [50]. The neighbourhood allows considering private and public spaces while the "home" and "city" mainly consider the former and latter, respectively [51].…”

Qualidade Ambiental Do Município De Imperatriz-Ma: Uma Análise Multicritério De Indicadores Intra-Urbanos

“…Estudo semelhante foi realizado nas cidades de Lodi e Gênova na Itália, avaliando a qualidade urbana de bairros de densidade média. Assim, Delsante (2016), analisando diferentes variáveis condizentes aos serviços básico, espaços públicos e infraestrutura urbana, identificou relações positivas entre qualidade urbana e saúde da população, nestas duas cidades europeias. Igualmente, Tonetti et al, (2018) estudando a qualidade ambiental dos bairros do município de Paranaguá -PR, Brasil, evidenciaram uma melhor qualidade ambiental nas regiões periféricas deste município, em bairros com predomínio de uso residencial e com vias sem tráfego intenso, exceto próximo ao Porto de Paranaguá.…”

“…Embora os dados censitários disponibilizados pelo Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) sejam mensuráveis e, cada vez mais, utilizados como indicadores da qualidade de vida das cidades brasileiras, o valor da paisagem urbana ainda é difícil de ser estimado e sua avaliação depende, em parte, de experiência subjetiva (DELSANTE, 2016). Porém, com o avanço das geotecnologias, muitos dos elementos relacionados com a qualidade da paisagem urbana são quantificáveis e passíveis de serem expressos diretamente ou convertidos através do processo de ponderação, em valores numéricos, em ambiente de Sistema de Informação Geográfica (SIG).…”