Onternational institutions, such as ODM (Onstitute of Medicine) and FAD/WHD (Food and Agriculture Drganization of the United Nations/World Health Drganization), have suggested regular fish consumption at least twice a week in order to reach benefits (Hellberg et al., 2012).Despite information based on scientific research regarding its importance and relevance to health, fish consumption displays a distinguished behavior worldwide (Maciel et al., 2016). Countries with native communities, for example, have an average consumption per capita 15-fold greater than those with urban populations (Cisneros-Montemayor et al., 2016). Fish is also part of the traditional diet in Asian countries. However, despite its high quality, fish is not part of the usual diet and culture of many western countries, as observed in Australia (Birch & Lawley, 2013) and Brazil (Maciel et al., 2013).On addition, FAD indicates a relationship with fish consumption and economic development. On 2009, in European and North America countries, fish consumption reached 22-24 kg person/year, in developing countries, fish consumption was 17 kg person/year and in low-income countries with food shortages, 10.1 kg (Barbaroux et al., 2012).Ot is assumed, therefore, that fish consumption is influenced by lifestyle-related indicators, socio-demographic issues and previous experiences with fish products (Myrland et al., 2000;Cardoso et al., 2016).Given that fish consumption can be an important part of a healthy lifestyle, it is hypothesized that individuals with higher fish consumption tend to have higher level of physical activity and higher scores in the perception of life quality (Maciel et al., 2016). Thus, this study evaluated the level of physical activity and perception of life quality among groups of higher and lower frequency of fish consumption