2014
DOI: 10.1590/fst.2014.0044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Modified atmosphere efficiency in the quality maintenance of Eva apples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Weight loss increased during the storage period for all treatments, reaching 9.26% during the last time period. These values are in agreement with the results found by Fante et al (2014), in which the weight losses of 'Eva' apples were between 3.63 and 8.79% after 135 days of storage, depending on the packaging used to wrap the fruit. The firmness of the apples decreased over time because of normal 4.10 KJ m -2 0 KJ m -2 : y = 0.0001x 2 -0.0523x + 77.89R 2 = 0.83 0.68 KJ m -2 : y = 1E-04x 2 -0.0559x + 77.645R 2 = 0.93 2.73 KJ m -2 : y = 2E-05x 3 -0.0029x 2 + 0.0763x + 75.91R 2 = 0.84 4.10 KJ m -2 : y = -1E-05x 3 + 0.0021x 2 -0.133x + 77.164R 2 = 0.89 0 KJ m -2 : y = -0.001x 2 + 0.1915x + 43.071R 2 = 0.98 0.68 KJ m -2 : y = -0.0013x 2 + 0.2473x + 42.166R 2 = 0.95 2.73 KJ m -2 : y = -0.0018x 2 + 0.2649x + 43.463R 2 = 0.76 4.10 KJ m -2 : y = -0.002x 2 + 0.2843x + 42.679R 2 = 0.90 ripening of the fruit.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Weight loss increased during the storage period for all treatments, reaching 9.26% during the last time period. These values are in agreement with the results found by Fante et al (2014), in which the weight losses of 'Eva' apples were between 3.63 and 8.79% after 135 days of storage, depending on the packaging used to wrap the fruit. The firmness of the apples decreased over time because of normal 4.10 KJ m -2 0 KJ m -2 : y = 0.0001x 2 -0.0523x + 77.89R 2 = 0.83 0.68 KJ m -2 : y = 1E-04x 2 -0.0559x + 77.645R 2 = 0.93 2.73 KJ m -2 : y = 2E-05x 3 -0.0029x 2 + 0.0763x + 75.91R 2 = 0.84 4.10 KJ m -2 : y = -1E-05x 3 + 0.0021x 2 -0.133x + 77.164R 2 = 0.89 0 KJ m -2 : y = -0.001x 2 + 0.1915x + 43.071R 2 = 0.98 0.68 KJ m -2 : y = -0.0013x 2 + 0.2473x + 42.166R 2 = 0.95 2.73 KJ m -2 : y = -0.0018x 2 + 0.2649x + 43.463R 2 = 0.76 4.10 KJ m -2 : y = -0.002x 2 + 0.2843x + 42.679R 2 = 0.90 ripening of the fruit.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The mean values obtained for this parameter were 11.46, 11.70, 11.86 and 11.9 for the control, 0.68 KJ m -², 2.73 KJ m -2 and 4.10 KJ m -² treatments, respectively. Fante et al (2014), while studying 'Eva' apples in different modified atmospheres, did not observe differences in SS up to 225 days of storage in all of the tested films. Figure 4 shows the vitamin C content of apples treated over 120 days of cold storage.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This inhibition of ethylene production promoted by ISW was previously reported in the climacteric papaya [ 15 ], but also in the non-climacteric fruit of pepper [ 29 ], and the immature fruit of cucumber [ 13 ]. MAP has been also found to reduce the production of ethylene in diverse fruit such as plum and apple [ 37 , 43 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%