2015
DOI: 10.1590/s1984-46702015000600007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The non-indigenous bryozoan Triphyllozoon (Cheilostomata: Phidoloporidae) in the Atlantic: morphology and dispersion on the Brazilian coast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, oil platforms are known to be moved between these regions (Sampaio et al, 2012), and are considered the main vector for the introduction of Tubastraea into the southwestern Atlantic (Castro & Pires, 2001; Creed et al, 2016). Thus, our data showing a lack of structure between localities, and the occurrence of shared MLLs for each species among these distant sites, indicate that anthropogenic vectors, such as oil platforms, monobuoys, or other vessels have played an important role in dispersing these alien invasive species, and possibly assisting other species to spread along the coast (Almeida et al, 2015; Creed et al, 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…On the other hand, oil platforms are known to be moved between these regions (Sampaio et al, 2012), and are considered the main vector for the introduction of Tubastraea into the southwestern Atlantic (Castro & Pires, 2001; Creed et al, 2016). Thus, our data showing a lack of structure between localities, and the occurrence of shared MLLs for each species among these distant sites, indicate that anthropogenic vectors, such as oil platforms, monobuoys, or other vessels have played an important role in dispersing these alien invasive species, and possibly assisting other species to spread along the coast (Almeida et al, 2015; Creed et al, 2016). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Such events are difficult to detect because of a lack of historical data, and therefore many possible alien species are currently treated as cryptogenic (Lopes et al, ). Most reported marine introductions are benthic forms, representing (in decreasing rank order based on the amount of study they have received) cnidarians (Castro and Pires, ; De Paula and Creed, ; Bardi and Marques, ; Silva et al, ), ascidians (Rocha and Kremer, ; Barros et al, ; Rocha et al, ; Marins et al, ; Skinner et al, ), molluscs (Domaneschi and Martins, ; Souza et al, ; Silveira et al, ; Breves‐Ramos et al, ; López et al, ), crustaceans (Young, ; Tavares and Mendonça, ; Mantelatto and Garcia, ; Farrapeira, ) and bryozoans (Farrapeira, ; Almeida et al, ).…”
Section: An Overview Of Marine Alien Species In South America: a Brazmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, oil platforms are known to be moved between these regions (Sampaio et al 2012), and are considered the main vector for the introduction of Tubastraea into the southwestern Atlantic (Castro and Pires 2001;Creed et al 2016). Thus, our data showing a lack of structure between localities, and the occurrence of shared MLLs for each species among these distant sites, indicate that anthropogenic vectors, such as oil platforms, monobuoys, or other vessels have played an important role in dispersing these alien invasive species, and possibly assisting other species to spread along the coast (Almeida et al 2015;Creed et al 2016).…”
Section: Peerj Reviewing Pdf | (mentioning
confidence: 81%