2013
DOI: 10.1590/s1984-46702013000300015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Morphology of immatures of Euschistus (Mitripus) grandis (Insecta: Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Identification of immature pentatomids relies on coloration (e.g., Fürstenau et al 2013). The nymphs of E. convergens are character-ized by a variegated pattern of brown and light yellow throughout all instars, differing from Euschistus (Mitripus) grandis Rolston and Euschistus (Mitripus) hansi Grazia; the latter species have 2 different sets of coloration, one from the 1st to 3rd instars and the other in the 4th and 5th instars (Martins & Campos 2006;Biasotto et al 2013). The use of coloration to identify pentatomid species should be done cautiously, as biotic and abiotic factors can alter the color of nymphs and adults (e.g., Schwertner et al 2002;Musolin & Numata 2003;Niva & Takeda 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Identification of immature pentatomids relies on coloration (e.g., Fürstenau et al 2013). The nymphs of E. convergens are character-ized by a variegated pattern of brown and light yellow throughout all instars, differing from Euschistus (Mitripus) grandis Rolston and Euschistus (Mitripus) hansi Grazia; the latter species have 2 different sets of coloration, one from the 1st to 3rd instars and the other in the 4th and 5th instars (Martins & Campos 2006;Biasotto et al 2013). The use of coloration to identify pentatomid species should be done cautiously, as biotic and abiotic factors can alter the color of nymphs and adults (e.g., Schwertner et al 2002;Musolin & Numata 2003;Niva & Takeda 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the 1st to 4th instars, the known immatures of Euschistus are morphologically similar. With regard to the subgenus Mitripus, the anterolateral pronotal margins are slightly convex (Martins & Campos 2006;Biasotto et al 2013), whereas in the subgenus Euschistus the anterolateral pronotal margins are straight (McPherson & Paskewitz 1984;Munyaneza & McPherson 1994). The 5th instars of Mitripus species have the humeral angles of the pronotum rounded, well produced, and the anterolateral margins concave (Martins & Campos 2006;Biasotto et al 2013), characteristics that can distinguish them from species of the subgenus Euschistus, in which the humeral angles of the pronotum are rounded, but not produced, and the anterolateral margins are straight or slightly concave (McPherson & Paskewitz 1984;Munyaneza & McPherson 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations