2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1984-46702010000200017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the taxonomy of the Neotropical spider genera Dossenus and Dyrines (Araneae: Lycosoidea: Trechaleidae) from Brazil

Abstract: The male of Dossenus guapore Silva, Lise & Carico, 2007 is described and illustrated for the first time, based on material from Bonito, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. The spider genus Dossenus Simon, 1898 is distributed from Panama to southern Brazil and can be distinguished by the other known genera of Trechaleidae by the median dark brown band on the carapace that extends to the abdomen and by the spoon-like shape of the median apophysis of the male palpus. A new species of Dyrines Simon, 1903, D. brescoviti sp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most commonly used method deals with the quantification of a shell’s linear dimensions such as shell length, shell width or number of whorl increments, which are then plotted against time (e.g., Kobayashi & Hadfield, 1996; Sulikowska-Drozd, 2011). Although these measurements are good estimators of the overall growth of the animal’s soft body (measured in weight; Oosterhoff, 1977; Chow, 1987; Elkarmi & Ismail, 2007; Silva, Molozzi & Callisto, 2010), they can hardly be linked with the accretionary growth process and spiral geometry of the shell. In addition, shell growth may be episodic because of different seasons, diurnal rhythms, or periods of activity and inactivity (Linsley & Javidpour, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used method deals with the quantification of a shell’s linear dimensions such as shell length, shell width or number of whorl increments, which are then plotted against time (e.g., Kobayashi & Hadfield, 1996; Sulikowska-Drozd, 2011). Although these measurements are good estimators of the overall growth of the animal’s soft body (measured in weight; Oosterhoff, 1977; Chow, 1987; Elkarmi & Ismail, 2007; Silva, Molozzi & Callisto, 2010), they can hardly be linked with the accretionary growth process and spiral geometry of the shell. In addition, shell growth may be episodic because of different seasons, diurnal rhythms, or periods of activity and inactivity (Linsley & Javidpour, 1980).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%