2013
DOI: 10.1590/s1983-41952013000400002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Concrete beams fire design using graphs

Abstract: The most expeditious method for the design of concrete beams under fire situation is the tabular method, presented by the Brazilian standard ABNT NBR 15200:2012. Albeit simple, this method constrains the engineer's work, as it prevents him to seek alternative solutions to the few tabulated values. Yet, the Brazilian standard allows employing more advanced methods. Hence, the purpose of this work was to perform a thermal and structural analysis of beams with several widths, heights, covers and diameters/layouts… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tabular method is widely accepted by the technical-scientific community because it is safe and practical, not requiring thermal or structural analysis of the elements, since safety is guaranteed by meeting minimum dimensions (Costa, 2008). The main disadvantage of this method is that it results in shorter fire resistance times than more complex methods (e Silva and Moreira, 2021;Albuquerque and Silva, 2013). This is because, usually, the tabulated methods do not take into account the real conditions of loading, design and behavior of the structure and can produce less economical results concerning more refined methods (Bolina et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tabular method is widely accepted by the technical-scientific community because it is safe and practical, not requiring thermal or structural analysis of the elements, since safety is guaranteed by meeting minimum dimensions (Costa, 2008). The main disadvantage of this method is that it results in shorter fire resistance times than more complex methods (e Silva and Moreira, 2021;Albuquerque and Silva, 2013). This is because, usually, the tabulated methods do not take into account the real conditions of loading, design and behavior of the structure and can produce less economical results concerning more refined methods (Bolina et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%