2014
DOI: 10.1590/s1980-65742014000200010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The aim of the study was to compare the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the following muscles: clavicular portion of pectoralis major, sternal portion of pectoralis major, long portion of triceps brachii, anterior deltoid, posterior deltoid and latissimus dorsi during dynamic contractions between flat horizontal bench press and barbell pulloverexercises. The sample comprised 12 males individuals experienced in resistance training. The volunteers made three visits to the laboratory. The first one consisted … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
20
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
20
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…www.efsupit.ro 2591 exercises, but there was a greater activation of AD in the bench press, when the exercises were performed until concentric failure. The observed results for AD are in agreement with those observed by Campos and Silva (2014), however when comparing the results for PM there seems to be a difference between the submaximal and the performed exercise until failure. It should be noted, also, a possible larger number of active units for both PM and DA in our study, since exercise was performed until failure, differently from the design proposed by Campos and Silva (2014), that controlled the number of repetitions performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…www.efsupit.ro 2591 exercises, but there was a greater activation of AD in the bench press, when the exercises were performed until concentric failure. The observed results for AD are in agreement with those observed by Campos and Silva (2014), however when comparing the results for PM there seems to be a difference between the submaximal and the performed exercise until failure. It should be noted, also, a possible larger number of active units for both PM and DA in our study, since exercise was performed until failure, differently from the design proposed by Campos and Silva (2014), that controlled the number of repetitions performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Marchetti and Uchida (2011) found that pullover activates PM during execution and can be included in a training program for this muscle group, but the efficiency depends on the external load applied. To our knowledge, there is only one study that compared bench press and pullover exercises, Campos and Silva (2014) observed higher activation of PM and AD in the bench press and higher activation of the triceps brachii and latissimus dorsi in pullover exercise. However, the exercise was not performed until failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Alternating details in exercise selection has been a very popular practice (Bishop, Chavda, & Turner, 2018;Read, Bishop, Brazier, & Turner, 2016). Our results indicate that the IMSP belongs to exercises targeting the TBlong with high activity such as the barbell pullover (Costa Campos & da Silva, 2014), flat BP and narrow grip BP (Barnett et al, 1995). However, the TBlat is not significantly targeted in the IMSP as in the flat BP (51-68% MVIC) where this muscle activity did not differ to TBlong (55-75% MVIC) in females (Gołaś, Maszczyk, Pietraszewski, et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…No que refere a ativação muscular do peitoral maior, diversos exercícios podem ser utilizados para o seu desenvolvimento, dentre eles o pullover. Dois estudos destacam-se por verificar através de análise de eletromiografia de superficie (sEMG) a participação do referido músculo como motor primário durante a realização do pullover 9,10 . Marchetti e Uchida 10 avaliaram a atividade sEMG das musculaturas do peitoral maior e latíssimo do dorso durante o exercício pullover barra e verificaram maior ativação do peitoral maior em comparação ao latíssimo do dorso encontrando uma diferença na ativação de 89% 10 .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Posteriormente, Campos e Silva 9 compararam o exercício pullover barra com o exercício supino horizontal, sendo que os resultados revelaram uma menor ativação das porções clavicular e esternal do peitoral maior e deltoide anterior no pullover quando comparado ao supino horizontal. Porém, ainda assim, o pullover se mostrou como um exercício efeitvo para o desenvolvimento das musculaturas supracitadas 9 . Considerando ainda a variação dos exercícios que compõem as rotinas de treinamento, verificamos que os mesmos podem ser realizados com diferentes empunhaduras, além de modificações nos equipamentos utilizados.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified