2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1809-29502008000200009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Esta é uma versão abreviada da dissertação da autora 1, apresentada à FMUSP para obtenção do título de Mestre em Ciências, sob orientação do autor 5. RESUMO: O objetivo deste estudo foi traduzir e adaptar culturalmente o Functional Measure for Amputees Questionnaire (FMA) para a população brasileira e analisar sua validade e eficácia quando aplicado em pacientes amputados de membro inferior. O procedimento seguiu as etapas de tradução, retro-tradução, análise das versões português e inglês por um comitê multid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature reviews by Silva et al (9) and Vidal et al (10) found no consensus on the domains that should be evaluated by research on quality of life for individuals with lower limb amputation. There are no tools to quantify these subjects' experiences systematically, and no consensus on what scales or instruments should be used (10,11). The use of nonvalidated or nonstandardized instruments should be avoided because their use makes it impossible to compare results, jeopardizes the reliability of the research, and hinders reproducibility (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature reviews by Silva et al (9) and Vidal et al (10) found no consensus on the domains that should be evaluated by research on quality of life for individuals with lower limb amputation. There are no tools to quantify these subjects' experiences systematically, and no consensus on what scales or instruments should be used (10,11). The use of nonvalidated or nonstandardized instruments should be avoided because their use makes it impossible to compare results, jeopardizes the reliability of the research, and hinders reproducibility (12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional Assessment Questionnaire for Amputees (FMA). Validated for Brazilian Portuguese language in 2008 (Kageyama et al, 2008) and is specific for this population. Composed of a series of individual questions to assess the levels of mobility, independence and extent of prosthetic use and to identify factors that may influence these results.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These issues associated with amputation should be considered important factors in the process of rehabilitation. According to Kageyama et al, 5 available instruments have different forms of evaluation, which makes comparing results difficult. Moreover, many researchers use scales or questionnaires designed for other clinical populations and adapt them to their studies, such as the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Reintegration of Normal Living (RNL) Index, and Barthel Index; others develop instruments and evaluate their psychometric properties, such as the Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee (PPA), Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ), Functional Measure for Amputees (FMA) Questionnaire, and the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales—Revised (TAPES-R).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, many researchers use scales or questionnaires designed for other clinical populations and adapt them to their studies, such as the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Reintegration of Normal Living (RNL) Index, and Barthel Index; others develop instruments and evaluate their psychometric properties, such as the Prosthetic Profile of the Amputee (PPA), Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ), Functional Measure for Amputees (FMA) Questionnaire, and the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales—Revised (TAPES-R). 4,511 However, studies on people with amputation in the Portuguese language of Brazil are lacking, due to an insufficiency of instruments that provide information about quality of life, physical activity 12 and satisfaction, fit, and use of the prosthesis. 13…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%