2011
DOI: 10.1590/s1807-59322011000600018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rearfoot alignment and medial longitudinal arch configurations of runners with symptoms and histories of plantar fasciitis

Abstract: OBJECTIVE:To evaluate and compare rearfoot alignment and medial longitudinal arch index during static postures in runners, with and without symptoms and histories of plantar fasciitis (PF).INTRODUCTION:PF is the third most common injury in runners but, so far, its etiology remains unclear. In the literature, rearfoot misalignment and conformations of the longitudinal plantar arch have been described as risk factors for the development of PF. However, in most of the investigated literature, the results are stil… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
1
19

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
52
1
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant findings for foot posture in non-athletic groups include a more pronated foot posture (Foot Posture Index, MD 1.3 (95% CI 0.42 to 2.18)), a lower sagittal plane calcaneal pitch on X-ray (MD −4.55° (95% CI −5.62 to −3.48)) and reduced sagittal arch angle change between NWB and WB (indicating greater arch stiffness) on X-ray 26 48 58. No significant associations were found for other types of measurements regarding foot posture 8 28 30 31 37 38 40 57. Static measures of leg alignment beyond the significant findings of Di Caprio yielded non-significant associations with a measure of ‘Q angle’ and lower limb length discrepancy 28…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Significant findings for foot posture in non-athletic groups include a more pronated foot posture (Foot Posture Index, MD 1.3 (95% CI 0.42 to 2.18)), a lower sagittal plane calcaneal pitch on X-ray (MD −4.55° (95% CI −5.62 to −3.48)) and reduced sagittal arch angle change between NWB and WB (indicating greater arch stiffness) on X-ray 26 48 58. No significant associations were found for other types of measurements regarding foot posture 8 28 30 31 37 38 40 57. Static measures of leg alignment beyond the significant findings of Di Caprio yielded non-significant associations with a measure of ‘Q angle’ and lower limb length discrepancy 28…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Measurements of static foot posture and lower limb alignment were reported in 11 studies 8 26 28 30 31 37 38 40 48 57 58. Significant findings for foot posture in non-athletic groups include a more pronated foot posture (Foot Posture Index, MD 1.3 (95% CI 0.42 to 2.18)), a lower sagittal plane calcaneal pitch on X-ray (MD −4.55° (95% CI −5.62 to −3.48)) and reduced sagittal arch angle change between NWB and WB (indicating greater arch stiffness) on X-ray 26 48 58.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these studies, Paiva de Castro et al 72 rately, Burns et al 12 incorporated both case-control (retrospective) and prospective study designs, and McManus et al 56 reported the results of their 2-year prospective study separately for each year. Eleven studies either utilized more than 1 method to categorize foot type 12,46,53 or assessed the foot using continuous scales, 5,7,12,26,38,52,63,79,81 and 4 studies reported on more than 1 lower extremity injury using either a dichotomous outcome 24,38,41 or a continuous scale. 34 In the meta-analysis, to account for all genders, feet (right/left), study designs, low back and lower extremity injuries, and methods of foot-type classification/ assessment reported in the included studies, the outcome of each analysis was entered separately as a unique study.…”
Section: Meta-analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These prior studies are typically limited by the assessment of a small number of foot disorders and have often focused on specific sub-samples that may not reflect population norms [15,16]. The purpose of this study is to assess the relation between foot disorders, and foot posture and function in a population-based sample of adults.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%