Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation (RF-EMR) from GSM (0.9/1.8GHZ) Mobile Phones Induces Oxidative Stress and Reduces Sperm Motility in Rats

Mailankot, Maneesh; Kunnath, Anil Philip; Jayalekshmi, H; Koduru, Bhargav; Valsalan, Rohith

doi:10.1590/s1807-59322009000600011

Cited by 146 publications

(114 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

100

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A number of recent reports have suggested a possible link between cell phone use and male infertility [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The concern has arisen that carrying a cellular phone near the reproductive organs such as the testes may cause dysfunction and particularly a decrease in sperm development and production, and thus decrease fertility in men.…”

Section: Studies In Malesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The study implicated that living in close proximity to mobile base stations might have an adverse outcome on male reproductive health [7]. Male albino Wistar rats (10-12 weeks old) were exposed to RF-EMR from an active mobile phone for 1 h continuously per day for 28 days [8]. No significant difference was observed in total sperm count between controls (exposed to a mobile phone without a battery for the same period) and RF-EMR exposed groups.…”

Section: Studies In Malesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, rats exposed to RF-EMR exhibited a significantly reduced percentage of motile sperm. Moreover, RF-EMR exposure resulted in a significant increase in lipid peroxidation and low GSH content in the testis and epididymis [8]. A significant decrease in protein kinase C and total sperm count, along with increased apoptosis, were observed in male Wistar rats exposed to mobile phone frequencies (2 h/day × 35 days) [9].…”

Section: Studies In Malesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Challenging cell phone impact on reproduction: A Review

Merhi

2012

J Assist Reprod Genet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) produced by cell phones can enhance the excitability of the brain and has recently been classified as carcinogenic. The suggested use of hands-free kits lowers the exposure to the brain, but it might theoretically increase exposure to the reproductive organs. This report summarizes the potential effects of RF-EMR on reproductive potentials in both males and females. Methods A critical review of the literature pertaining to the impact of cell phone RF-EMR on reproduction in male and female animals and humans was performed, with a focus on gonad metabolism, apoptosis of reproductive cells, fertility status, and serum reproductive hormones. Results While some animal and human studies revealed alterations in reproductive physiology in both males and females, others did not report any association. The in vitro and in vivo studies to date are highly diverse, very inconsistent in conduct and, in many cases, report different primary outcomes. Conclusion The increasing use of cell phone warrants welldesigned studies to ascertain the effect of their RF-EMR on reproduction.

show abstract

Section: Studies In Malesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Studies In Malesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Studies In Malesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Challenging cell phone impact on reproduction: A Review

Merhi

2012

J Assist Reprod Genet

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As the alkaline Comet assay failed to reveal any detectable DNA strand breakage in these cells, the authors conclude that RFEMR has insufficient energy to effect the direct induction of DNA strand breaks but may generate genotoxicity through the induction of oxidative DNA base damage in male germ cells . Similarly, in animal studies, exposure of rats to RFEMR has been shown to impair sperm motility and increase levels of oxidative stress in the testes and epididymis (Mailankot et al 2009). The clinical relevance of such observations has been emphasised in several studies suggesting a relationship between extensive mobile phone use and DNA fragmentation in human spermatozoa , Rago et al 2013.…”

Section: Electromagnetic Radiationmentioning

confidence: 97%

Age, the environment and our reproductive future: bonking baby boomers and the future of sex

Aitken

2014

Reproduction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has never been a greater need for scientists trained in reproductive science. Most developed countries are witnessing unprecedented rates of recourse to assisted conception sitting cheek-by-jowl with high rates of induced abortion. This article addresses these two incongruous faces of reproductive healthcare. Every year at least 44 million abortions are performed worldwide, many under unsafe and insanitary conditions that carry a significant risk to the lives of women deprived of safe, effective methods for controlling their fertility. Although birth control is a complex issue involving myriad social and political factors, the technical vacuum in this area is significant. Through no fault of the family planning authorities, there have been no radically new methods of fertility control since the oral contraceptive pill was introduced in 1960 and even this contribution to planned parenthood has its roots in the biochemistry of the 1920s and 1930s. Moreover, the pharmaceutical industry has, by and large, turned its back on fundamental research activities in this area. At present, our major investment in reproductive healthcare involves treating ever-increasing numbers of couples with assisted reproductive technologies (ART). However, these treatments are often delivered without critically considering the underlying causes of this condition or seriously contemplating the long-term consequences of the current enthusiasm for such therapy. Significantly, the clinical factors underpinning the commitment of couples to ART include advanced maternal age and a variety of lifestyle factors, such as smoking and obesity, which are known to compromise the developmental potential of the oocyte and DNA integrity in spermatozoa.

show abstract

“…Many recent studies have raised questions regarding the safety of such RF-EMWs (Radiofrequency-Electromagnetic waves) exposure to humans [3]. Adverse effects studied by several clinical trials include the possible link to increased risk of vehicular accidents, leukemias, sleep disturbances and more serious brain tumours [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Auditory Brainstem Responses and EMFs Generated by Mobile Phones

Khullar

Sood

2013

Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There has been a manifold increase in the number of mobile phone users throughout the world with the current number of users exceeding 2 billion. However this advancement in technology like many others is accompanied by a progressive increase in the frequency and intensity of electromagnetic waves without consideration of the health consequences. The aim of our study was to advance our understanding of the potential adverse effects of GSM mobile phones on auditory brainstem responses (ABRs). 60 subjects were selected for the study and divided into three groups of 20 each based on their usage of mobile phones. Their ABRs were recorded and analysed for latency of waves I-V as well as interpeak latencies I-III, I-V and III-V (in ms). Results revealed no significant difference in the ABR parameters between group A (control group) and group B (subjects using mobile phones for maximum 30 min/day for 5 years). However the latency of waves was significantly prolonged in group C (subjects using mobile phones for 10 years for a maximum of 30 min/day) as compared to the control group. Based on our findings we concluded that long term exposure to mobile phones may affect conduction in the peripheral portion of the auditory pathway. However more research needs to be done to study the long term effects of mobile phones particularly of newer technologies like smart phones and 3G.

show abstract

Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Radiation (RF-EMR) from GSM (0.9/1.8GHZ) Mobile Phones Induces Oxidative Stress and Reduces Sperm Motility in Rats

Cited by 146 publications

References 28 publications

Challenging cell phone impact on reproduction: A Review

Challenging cell phone impact on reproduction: A Review

Age, the environment and our reproductive future: bonking baby boomers and the future of sex

Auditory Brainstem Responses and EMFs Generated by Mobile Phones

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About