2009
DOI: 10.1590/s1806-37132009000500012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Guided sputum sample collection and culture contamination rates in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB

Abstract: A comparative study to evaluate contamination in cultures of morning sputum samples, comparing those collected at home under currently recommended conditions and those collected under supervision after patient orientation and education. The home and supervised collection groups produced 43 and 76 sputum samples, respectively. The contamination rate was nearly 3-times higher among samples collected at home than among those collected under supervision (37% vs. 13%, p < 0.05; OR = 0.25). The simple educational an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observed less contamination with spot samples (which were supervised at collection sites) when compared with the EM samples (which were not unsupervised at collection sites); however, this may not be significant since we did not provide patients with water or other materials to minimize normal flora prior to expectoration. Nevertheless, this finding is supported by similar findings in a previous study [27]. It is also worth noting that high contamination rates may have contributed to underestimation of TB cases by MGIT and increased the cost of doing the test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We observed less contamination with spot samples (which were supervised at collection sites) when compared with the EM samples (which were not unsupervised at collection sites); however, this may not be significant since we did not provide patients with water or other materials to minimize normal flora prior to expectoration. Nevertheless, this finding is supported by similar findings in a previous study [27]. It is also worth noting that high contamination rates may have contributed to underestimation of TB cases by MGIT and increased the cost of doing the test.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Fourteen of the 40 patients confirmed to have TB had positive cultures only on specimens collected after rinsing with an antiseptic mouthwash. Our results add to the growing body of knowledge showing that attention to sputum collection methods and oral hygiene may enhance the yield of sputum examination (1,6,8,10).…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…A total of 70 Sputum samples were collected from patient attending Tanta Chest Disease Hospital during April 2016 to March 2017. According to Maciel et al (2009), Samples were collected early morning after fasting for 8-10hr on a period of two consecutive days. Collection of samples was carried out under direct supervision and using standardized guidance as follows; each patient was asked to use a toothbrush (provided by the study), without toothpaste, to gently remove any food residue from teeth and gums.…”
Section: Collection Of Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%