2013
DOI: 10.1590/s1679-62252013000200009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

New species of Eugerres from the Usumacinta Province, México and Guatemala with a redescription of E. mexicanus (Steindachner, 1863) (Teleostei: Gerreidae)

Abstract: Eugerres castroaguirrei, new species is described from the río Grijalva-Usumacinta basin of southeastern Mexico and northern Guatemala. Eugerres castroaguirrei and E. mexicanus are distinguishable from their marine estuarine congeners by the dorsalfin origin posterior to the insertion of the pectoral and pelvic fins, a shorter and broad based supraoccipital crest, and a distinct geographic distribution restricted to freshwater habitats. Eugerres castroaguirrei differs from E. mexicanus by diagnostic characters… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Biometric data were analysed as proportions of standard length (%SL; fi ve body proportions), body depth (%BD; two body proportions), head length (%HL; fi ve body proportions), and three other body proportions, as suggested in the original description of E. castroaguirrei. In addition to the fi sh sample described above, comparisons also include the data set of 42 specimens of E. castroaguirrei (six type specimens, plus 35 non-type specimens; SL: 114.6 to 241.7 mm; mean = 201.0 mm) and 125 specimens of E. mexicanus (three type specimens, plus 122 non-type specimens; SL: 43.7 to 193.0 mm; mean = 146.4 mm), that were reported in the description of the new species by González-Acosta and Rodiles-Hernández (2013;Pp. 309-310).…”
Section: Morphological Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Biometric data were analysed as proportions of standard length (%SL; fi ve body proportions), body depth (%BD; two body proportions), head length (%HL; fi ve body proportions), and three other body proportions, as suggested in the original description of E. castroaguirrei. In addition to the fi sh sample described above, comparisons also include the data set of 42 specimens of E. castroaguirrei (six type specimens, plus 35 non-type specimens; SL: 114.6 to 241.7 mm; mean = 201.0 mm) and 125 specimens of E. mexicanus (three type specimens, plus 122 non-type specimens; SL: 43.7 to 193.0 mm; mean = 146.4 mm), that were reported in the description of the new species by González-Acosta and Rodiles-Hernández (2013;Pp. 309-310).…”
Section: Morphological Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The collected fi sh are held in the Ichthyological Collection (CI) from Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas (CICIMAR-CI 8810-11). The taxonomic determination of fi eld-collected and museum specimens was carried out under a stereomicroscope according to the morphological characteristics described in the reference diagnosis for both species by Deckert and Greenfi eld (1987) and González-Acosta and Rodiles-Hernández (2013), and also to additional criteria established by Castro- Aguirre et al (1999) for the species Eugerres mexicanus. It should be emphasized that González-Acosta and Rodiles-Hernán-dez (2013) did not include a dichotomous key for species identifi cation, and that all of the measurable diagnostic characters fi gured for Eugerres castroaguirrei are overlapped with those of E. mexicanus (see Introduction section herein, and González-Acosta and Rodiles-Hernández 2013; Pp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations