2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1679-62252008000200005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomal variability in the wild ornamental species of Symphysodon (Perciformes: Cichlidae) from Amazon

Abstract: Cytogenetic studies were conducted on three discus species which inhabit the Amazon in Brazil: Symphysodon haraldi from Manacapuru, S. aequifasciatus from Tefé and S. discus from Barcelos. All individuals showed 2n=60 chromosomes, most of them biarmed. No sexual chromosomal heteromorphism was verified. However, different karyotypic formulae, owing to the presence of subtelocentric chromosomes, were verified for S. aequifasciatus and S. discus. One of the karyotypic formulae from S. aequifasciatus (cytotype 2) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that the length of the translocated chromosome segments largely depends on the distribution of heterochromatin, which by accumulating satellite DNA and transposable elements, may be a preferable site for breakages [21,22]. Exchanges of diverse, often distal portions of chromosome arms are postulated in Gibasis pulchella, where C-banding is mainly intercalary [23] and in the two Discus fish species where heterochromatin not only resides at the pericentromeres but also constitutes a large proximal portion of some of the chromosome arms [20,24]. Whole arm translocations (WATs) are postulated to have operated in Oenothera and R. spathacea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It seems that the length of the translocated chromosome segments largely depends on the distribution of heterochromatin, which by accumulating satellite DNA and transposable elements, may be a preferable site for breakages [21,22]. Exchanges of diverse, often distal portions of chromosome arms are postulated in Gibasis pulchella, where C-banding is mainly intercalary [23] and in the two Discus fish species where heterochromatin not only resides at the pericentromeres but also constitutes a large proximal portion of some of the chromosome arms [20,24]. Whole arm translocations (WATs) are postulated to have operated in Oenothera and R. spathacea.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Half of the homologous arms are perfectly matched in length (2B-3B, 3b-4b, 5c-6c, 8E-9E, 10F-11F, 11f-12f); thus, the involvement of the chromosomes harbouring them in whole arm rearrangements seems conceivable. In general, models of karyotype evolution are becoming more complex than previously envisaged, as combinations of peri-and/or paracentric inversions and translocations are now thought to be frequent [22,24,36,37]. In both animals and plants, structural rearrangements are among the mechanisms proposed to be involved in relocating rDNA or seeding its parts (if a breakpoint splits a locus into minor ones), creating new rDNA loci [38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Mesquita et al (2008) indicated that S. discus and S. haraldi also have a derived karyotype. All of the Symphysodon species have a high diploid number (2n ¼ 60), with a predominance of meta/submetacentric chromosomes, inter-and intraspecific morphological variation in some chromosomal pairs, and microchromosomes (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the Symphysodon species have a high diploid number (2n ¼ 60), with a predominance of meta/submetacentric chromosomes, inter-and intraspecific morphological variation in some chromosomal pairs, and microchromosomes (Table 1). The high diploid number detected in Symphysodon was explained as a consequence of polyploidization (Thompson, 1976); it might also have arisen through chromosomal rearrangements, such as pericentric inversions, translocations and fissions/ fusions (Mesquita et al, 2008). The different karyotypic formula reported for different Symphysodon species may include errors, as the level of chromosome condensation surely interfered in the analysis, and most of authors did not use the terminology 'microchromosomes'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation